Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VERF, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of VERF, LLC in 450 ROSS CLARK CIRCLE, DOTHAN, AL 36303 (NAICS 811198). OSHA activity number 347533770.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Verf, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Verf, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VERF, LLC
Site address
450 ROSS CLARK CIRCLE
City
DOTHAN
State
AL
ZIP
36303
Mailing
450 ROSS CLARK CIRCLE, DOTHAN, AL 36303
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811198
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2024
Abate by
Oct 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,350 · Current $1,410 Reduced

Hazardous substances 04350440088710301080

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  a)	Paint booth and body repair areas:  On or about June 26, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer failed to verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and which identified the documents as a certification of hazard assessment for tasks such as, but not limited to, spray finishing and chemical stripper applications.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1410
  • — Z (S) $2350

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2024
Abate by
Oct 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 04400871103024402590

29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1):Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  a)	Repair shop:  On or about June 5, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards by not requiring employees to wear face or eye protection when applying corrosive Benco Industrial Paint Remove with a brush to automobiles to remove paint.  b)	Spray booth areas:  On or about June 5, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards by not requiring employees to wear face or eye protection when applying solvent based paints with a pneumatic sprayer to automobiles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2024
Abate by
Oct 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 043508871030

29 CFR  1910.138(a):The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  a) Surface Recon paint removal area:  On or about June 26, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical burn hazards without selecting the proper type of hand protection for employees applying corrosive Benco Industrial Paint Remover with brushes and rollers and removing it with a scrapper hand tool. Employees are provided and sometimes use orange nitrile gloves that are not appropriate for corrosive chemical protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2024
Abate by
Oct 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,350 · Current $1,410 Reduced

Hazardous substances 08711030

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a)	Surface Recon area:  On or about June 5, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to loss of vision and skin burns, in that the employer did not provide a functional eye and body wash station to employees while performing daily job task of using corrosive Benco Industrial Paint Remover and Solvents to remove paint from automobiles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1410
  • — Z (S) $2350

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a)	Spray Finishing and Repair Area:  On or about June 5, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer provided and required use of tight-fitting respirators for spray finishing and did not ensure use a medical evaluation before use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a)	Spray Finishing Area:  On or about June 5, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer provided and required use of tight-fitting respirators during spray finishing and did not ensure fit tested before use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2024
Abate by
Oct 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1)(i):The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  a)Facility wide:  On or about June 5, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer did not provide a list of hazardous chemicals to its employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2024
Abate by
Oct 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Facility wide:  On or about June 5, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer did not provide hazard communication training to its employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347533770.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.