WATERFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: M&L GENERAL CONTRACTOR LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of M&L GENERAL CONTRACTOR LLC in 122 BOSTON POST RD, WATERFORD, CT 06385 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347536534.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- M&L GENERAL CONTRACTOR LLC
- Site address
- 122 BOSTON POST RD
- City
- WATERFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06385
- Mailing
- 16 REUVEN DR, LEDYARD, CT 06339
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2024
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees from exposure to fall hazards by using the forks of a rough terrain forklift as a work platform without any fall protection or other safety precautions in place. 122 Boston Post Road, Waterford, CT. On or about June 7, 2024: a) Employees were elevated approximately 25 feet above ground level on the forks of a Lull 844C-42 Rough Terrain Forklift Truck in order to conduct framing activities on the peak of a dormer. The employees were not provided with fall protection and were not otherwise elevated in a manner consistent with the requirements of ANSI B56.6 Section 5.15.1.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.28 A
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.28(a): Appropriate personal protective equipment was not worn by employee(s) in all operations where there was exposure to hazardous conditions: 122 Boston Post Road Waterford, CT. On or about June 7, 2024 employees were not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment under the following conditions while conducting framing activities: a) No head protection worn by employees working on the ground level and exposed to falling object hazards from those working on the roof above them. b) No eye protection worn by employees exposed to flying object hazards from the use of using pneumatic nailers, hammers, and cordless electric drill/ drivers.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: 122 Boston Post Road Waterford, CT: On or about June 7, 2024 employees engaged in framing activities on a 12-12 pitch roof at heights varying from 15 to 25 feet above ground level were not protected by any guardrail systems, personal fall arrest, or alternative fall protection measures.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: 122 Boston Post Road Waterford, CT. On or about June 7, 2024 the employer did not provide training to their employees in PPE selection, use, or hazard recognition for framing activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2024
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: 122 Boston Post Road Waterford, CT: On or about June 7, 2024 the side rails of a portable extension ladder used to access and egress a 12-12 pitch roof did not extend at least three feet above the surface being accessed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3457
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347536534.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.