FRANKFORT, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JACEK SKUPIEN
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JACEK SKUPIEN in 20170 CRYSTAL LAKE WAY, FRANKFORT, IL 60423 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347550295.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JACEK SKUPIEN
- Site address
- 20170 CRYSTAL LAKE WAY
- City
- FRANKFORT
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60423
- Mailing
- 14524 S. 135TH ST., LOCKPORT, IL 60441
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about November 15, 2024 - the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 0200110/17/2024
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $388
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about June 13, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working on the ground, below roofing activities, was not wearing a hard hat to protect against falling materials and debris.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4148
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. On or about June 13, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees using pneumatic nail guns did not wear safety glasses, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about June 13, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing residential roofing operations, sixteen (16) feet three (3) inches above the ground, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing an employee to fall hazards. b. On or about June 13, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, ten (10) feet six (6) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a. On or about June 13, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347550295.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.