MANHATTAN, IL —
OSHA Inspection: VICTOR VAZQUEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VICTOR VAZQUEZ in 26011 S. CARDIFF WAY, MANHATTAN, IL 60442 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347564916.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VICTOR VAZQUEZ
- Site address
- 26011 S. CARDIFF WAY
- City
- MANHATTAN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60442
- Mailing
- 5638 S. BISHOP ST., CHICAGO, IL 60636
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about September 20, 2024 - the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 0200108/23/2024
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $388
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. On or about June 17, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a pneumatic nail gun was not wearing safety glasses, thereby exposing the employee to hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about June 17, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, approximately seven (7) feet above a lower level, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: a. On or about June 17, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, approximately seven (7) feet above a lower level roof, did not have a ladder or other means of safe egress installed, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a. On or about June 17, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations had been provided with fall protection training; however, the employer failed to verify the training by preparing a written certification of training record.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Victor Vazquez
View Victor Vazquez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347564916.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.