NATICK, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: LAURAS CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LAURAS CONSTRUCTION INC. in 271 N. MAIN ST., NATICK, MA 01760 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347581399.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LAURAS CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 271 N. MAIN ST.
- City
- NATICK
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01760
- Mailing
- 1 PURCHASE ST. APT 2, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): The employer permitted employees to work in close proximity to energized, unguarded, and ungrounded electric power circuits that the employee could contact in the course of their work:. Location - At the roofs edge near the live electrical lines. On or about 6/27/2024, employees installing aluminum flashing on a residential roof were not protected from potentially contacting energized service lines.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Location - Roof On or about 6/27/2024, employees were not protected from falling to a lower level while working at heights greater than 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347581399.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.