Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HARLEQUIN DESIGN NEW YORK INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HARLEQUIN DESIGN NEW YORK INC in 85 BI COUNTY BOULEVARD, FARMINGDALE, NY 11735 (NAICS 541490). OSHA activity number 347593907.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Harlequin Design NEW York INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Harlequin Design NEW York INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
85 BI COUNTY BOULEVARD
City
FARMINGDALE
State
NY
ZIP
11735
Mailing
85 BI COUNTY BOULEVARD, FARMINGDALE, NY 11735
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541490
Employees
36
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $5,700 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.36(d)(1):Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge.  a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about 7/2/2024 the emergency exit door in the fabrication department was locked and was unable to be opened.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5700
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.38 B

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,453 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.38(b): The employer did not have an emergency action plan in writing to include the minimum elements described in 1910.38(c), kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review.  a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about 7/2/2024, the employer did not develop written emergency action plan at the workplace.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5000
  • — Z (S) $6453

1910.38 E

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.38(e):The employer did not designate and train employees to assist in a safe and orderly evacuation of other employees:  a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735 On or about 7/2/2024, the employer did not designate and train employees to assist in a safe and orderly evacuation of others.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,453 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735.  On or about July 2nd 2024, Employees products such as but not limited to epoxies, resins and adhesives containing hazardous chemicals, methyl ethyl ketone, toluene, xylene and methyl acetate. The employer did not develop, implement and or maintain a written hazard communication program at the workplace.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $6453

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1):The employer did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.  a) At the facility  85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd, 2024 the employer did not have safety data sheets in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they used.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area.  a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd, 2024, employees were not provided with information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd, 2024, employees were required to wear 3M half-face respirators and the employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1)(ii) The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735.. On or before July 2nd, 2024 the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employee required to use 3M half-face  respirators.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2):The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter:   a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY, 11735. On or before July 2nd, 2024 the employees using tight -fitting facepiece  3M half-face respirators were not fit tested.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators.    a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard  Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd, 2024 the employer did not ensure that the employee who are required to wear respirators were trained.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347593907.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.