FARMINGDALE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: HARLEQUIN DESIGN NEW YORK INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HARLEQUIN DESIGN NEW YORK INC in 85 BI COUNTY BOULEVARD, FARMINGDALE, NY 11735 (NAICS 541490). OSHA activity number 347593907.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HARLEQUIN DESIGN NEW YORK INC
- Site address
- 85 BI COUNTY BOULEVARD
- City
- FARMINGDALE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11735
- Mailing
- 85 BI COUNTY BOULEVARD, FARMINGDALE, NY 11735
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 541490
- Employees
- 36
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 D01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,067 · Current $5,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1):Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge. a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about 7/2/2024 the emergency exit door in the fabrication department was locked and was unable to be opened. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $5700
- — Z (S) $8067
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,453 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(b): The employer did not have an emergency action plan in writing to include the minimum elements described in 1910.38(c), kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review. a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about 7/2/2024, the employer did not develop written emergency action plan at the workplace. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $5000
- — Z (S) $6453
1910.38 E
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(e):The employer did not designate and train employees to assist in a safe and orderly evacuation of other employees: a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735 On or about 7/2/2024, the employer did not designate and train employees to assist in a safe and orderly evacuation of others. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,453 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd 2024, Employees products such as but not limited to epoxies, resins and adhesives containing hazardous chemicals, methyl ethyl ketone, toluene, xylene and methyl acetate. The employer did not develop, implement and or maintain a written hazard communication program at the workplace. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $6453
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):The employer did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use. a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd, 2024 the employer did not have safety data sheets in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they used. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area. a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd, 2024, employees were not provided with information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd, 2024, employees were required to wear 3M half-face respirators and the employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01 II
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(ii) The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735.. On or before July 2nd, 2024 the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employee required to use 3M half-face respirators. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter: a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY, 11735. On or before July 2nd, 2024 the employees using tight -fitting facepiece 3M half-face respirators were not fit tested. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators. a) At the facility 85 Bi Country Boulevard Farmingdale NY 11735. On or about July 2nd, 2024 the employer did not ensure that the employee who are required to wear respirators were trained. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 541490)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347593907.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.