Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JINGDONG LOGISTICS UNITED STATES COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JINGDONG LOGISTICS UNITED STATES COMPANY in 4375 SOUTH LEE STREET, BUFORD, GA 30518 (NAICS 541614). OSHA activity number 347604498.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jingdong Logistics United States Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jingdong Logistics United States Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4375 SOUTH LEE STREET
City
BUFORD
State
GA
ZIP
30518
Mailing
4375 SOUTH LEE STREET, BUFORD, GA 30518
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541614
Employees
373
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,913 · Current $4,148 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.22(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that all places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces are kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition.   a) Warehouse/Aisles - On or about July 09, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to trip hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that all passageways were maintained in a clean and orderly conditions when debris, plastics and papers were observed on the aisles and floor of walking/working surfaces.   b) Warehouse/Charging Station - On or about July 09, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to trip hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that all passageways were maintained in a clean and orderly conditions when the charging station for the power industrial trucks was observed to have paper, debris and a charging ports on the floor of walking/working surfaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4147.8
  • — Z (S) $6913

1910.22 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): The employer did not ensure that walking-working surfaces are inspected, regularly and as necessary, and maintained in a safe condition.   a) Warehouse/Production Table area - On or about July 09, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to trip hazards in that, employer failed to ensure that walking-working surfaces were inspected regularly, allowing conditions to exist when the yellow extension cord going across the walking surface, was maintained on the floor of working area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,218 · Current $5,531 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  a) Warehouse Exit - On or about July 05, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards in that, employer failed to ensure that an exit route was maintained free and unobstructed while boxes of the products and supplies blocked the emergency exit door.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5530.8
  • — Z (S) $9218

1910.147 A03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,218 · Current $5,531 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(a)(3)(i): The employer failed to establish a program and utilize procedures for affixing appropriate lockout devices or tagout devices to energy isolating devices and to otherwise disable machines or equipment to prevent unexpected energization, startup or release of stored energy in order to prevent injury to employees.  a) Throughout the warehouse - On or about July 09 2024, and times prior, the employer exposed employees to electrical shock and struck by hazards in that, employer failed to establish and provide a LOTO program for the baler and power industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5530.8
  • — Z (S) $9218

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $13,828 · Current $8,297 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):   a) Throughout the warehouse - On or about July 5, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that, employer failed to provide the training and evaluation to each powered industrial truck operator prior to operate the powered industrial at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8296.8
  • — Z (S) $13828

1910.178 L03 II C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(3)(ii)(C): Powered industrial truck operators did not receive initial training in workplace related topics for load manipulation, stacking and unstacking:  a) Throughout the warehouse - On or about July 05, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that adequately training was provided to powered industrial truck operators in load manipulation, stacking, and unstacking for this specific operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,913 · Current $4,148 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  a) Throughout the facility - On or about July 09, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that, employer failed to ensure that examination on power industrial trucks was performed before the operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4147.8
  • — Z (S) $6913

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  a) Throughout the warehouse - On or about July 05, 2024, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards in that, employer failed to ensure that workplace hazard assessment was conducted through a certification for the hazards associated with warehouse operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jingdong Logistics United States Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347604498.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.