Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ISMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ISMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC in 76 MAPLE STREET, MANCHESTER, NH 03101 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347630683.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ismith Construction Services INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ismith Construction Services INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
76 MAPLE STREET
City
MANCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03101
Mailing
190 HEMENWAY ROAD, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01701
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2024
Abate by
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $2,075 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2075
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2024
Abate by
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2024
Abate by
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where the employer did not require employees to wear eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2024
Abate by
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,355 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.   Site- Employees working from a low sloped roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 13 feet where fall protection was not utilized by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4355
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2024
Abate by
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toe boards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   Site- Employees working from a steep sloped roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not utilized by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2024
Abate by
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.552 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2024
Abate by
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,355 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators:   Site- Employees operating and working near an RGC P225 material ladder hoist were not protected from struck by hazards where the material ladder hoist was operated without bolts and nuts connecting the two splice plates to each section of the ladder hoist.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4355
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2024
Abate by
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to access the pitched roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder did not extend three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3457

View Ismith Construction Services INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347630683.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.