OSHA Inspection: CAIZAN ROOFING CORPORATION

Issued

Nov 12, 2024

Abate by

Dec 16, 2024

Penalty

Initial $388 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4b, 5, 6 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent October 21, 2024.

Issued

Nov 12, 2024

Abate by

Dec 16, 2024

Penalty

Initial $388 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 4a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent October 21, 2024.

Issued

Aug 7, 2024

Abate by

Sep 3, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,457 · Current $500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.

Issued

Aug 7, 2024

Abate by

Sep 3, 2024

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.

Issued

Aug 7, 2024

Abate by

Aug 13, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,457 · Current $500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   Site- Employees working from the ground were not protected from overhead struck by hazards where head protection was not required to be worn by the employer.

Issued

Aug 7, 2024

Abate by

Aug 13, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,457 · Current $500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn by the employer.

Issued

Aug 7, 2024

Abate by

Aug 13, 2024

Penalty

Initial $4,839 · Current $500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not utilized by the employer.

Issued

Aug 7, 2024

Abate by

Aug 13, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,457 · Current $500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators:   Site- Employees operating and working near an RGC P225 material ladder hoist were not protected from struck by hazards where the material ladder hoist was operated without bolts and nuts connecting the two splice plates to each section of the ladder hoist.

Issued

Aug 7, 2024

Abate by

Aug 13, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,457 · Current $500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to access the pitched roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder did not extend three feet above the landing surface.

Issued

Aug 7, 2024

Abate by

Sep 3, 2024

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.