Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KEES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KEES, INC. in 400 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, ELKHART LAKE, WI 53020 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 347657074.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kees, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kees, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KEES, INC.
Site address
400 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
ELKHART LAKE
State
WI
ZIP
53020
Mailing
PO BOX 327, ELKHART LAKE, WI 53020
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,113 · Current $2,879 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).  a) On or about August 2, 2024, at the establishment located at 400 South Industrial Drive, Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin; the employer did not fully implement their written respiratory protection program for an employee that voluntarily used a tight-fitting half-face elastomeric respirator, exposing an employee to the hazards associated inadequate physical/physiological capability.  Key provisions in a voluntary use respiratory protection program include, but are not limited to the following:  1)  Medical evaluations for respirator use
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2879.1
  • — Z (S) $4113

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.  a) On or about August 2, 2024, at the establishment located at 400 South Industrial Drive, Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin; the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine an employee's ability to use a half-face tight-fitting elastomeric respirator when worn voluntarily, exposing an employee to the hazards associated inadequate physical/physiological capability.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 A02 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,485 · Current $3,840 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.252(a)(2)(vii): Where practicable, all combustibles shall be relocated at least 35 feet (10.7 m) from the work site. Where relocation is impracticable, combustibles shall be protected with flameproofed covers or otherwise shielded with metal or asbestos guards or curtains.  a) On or about and at times prior to July 31, 2024, at the establishment located at 400 South Industrial Drive, Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin, the employer did not ensure that where the relocation of combustibles was impracticable, they were protected flameproofed covers or otherwise shielded, exposing employees to fire hazards. Unprotected oxygen cylinders were stored within 35 feet of a welding booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3839.5
  • — Z (S) $5485

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8370

29 CFR  1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Protection from arc welding rays. Where the work permits, the welder should be enclosed in an individual booth painted with a finish of low reflectivity such as zinc oxide (an important factor for absorbing ultraviolet radiations) and lamp black, or shall be enclosed with noncombustible screens similarly painted. Booths and screens shall permit circulation of air at floor level. Workers or other persons adjacent to the welding areas shall be protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields or shall be required to wear appropriate goggles.  a) On or about and at times prior to July 31, 2024, at the establishment located at 400 South Industrial Drive, Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin; the employer did not ensure that welding work performed was enclosed by an individual booth, noncombustible or flameproof screens, or requiring the use of appropriate goggles to protect employees working in the adjacent area from ultraviolet radiation generated by welding, exposing employees to the hazards associated with ultraviolet radiation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 L01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2024
Abate by
Nov 22, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1): General hazard communication requirements: (i) Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors and employers shall comply with all requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200) for chromium (VI); (ii) In classifying the hazards of chromium (VI) at least the following hazards are to be addressed: Cancer, eye irritation, and skin sensitization; and (iii) Employers shall include chromium (VI) in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS (29 CFR 1910.1200). Employers shall ensure that each employee has access to labels on containers of chromium (VI) and to safety data sheets, and is trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (l)(2) of this section.  a) On or about and at times prior to July 31, 2024, at the establishment located at 400 South Industrial Drive, Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin, the employer did not provide employees exposed to chromium (VI) with training on the general hazard communication requirements for chromium (VI).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 L02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2024
Abate by
Nov 22, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR  1910.1026(l)(2): The employer shall ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of at least the following: (A) The contents of this section; and (B) The purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program required by paragraph (k) of 29 CFR 1910.1026.  a) On or about and at times prior to July 31, 2024, at the establishment located at 400 South Industrial Drive, Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to chromium (VI) could demonstrate knowledge in the contents of 29 CFR 1910.1026.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2024
Abate by
Nov 22, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): Employees shall be informed of the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets required by this section.  a) On or about and at times prior to July 31, 2024, at the establishment located at 400 South Industrial Drive, Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin; the employer did not ensure that employees were aware of the location that safety data sheets for chemicals being used in the workplace were being kept. Employees used hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to compressed gases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Kees, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347657074.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.