Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: STEGER'S, LTD.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STEGER'S, LTD. in 500 1/2 S MAIN ST, PEKIN, IL 61554 (NAICS 442110). OSHA activity number 347671281.

Watch Steger'S, LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Steger'S, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
STEGER'S, LTD.
Site address
500 1/2 S MAIN ST
City
PEKIN
State
IL
ZIP
61554
Mailing
818 COURT STREET, PEKIN, IL 61554
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
442110
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11292.00 · Current $5646.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees operated a powered industrial truck while working from a platform exposed to fall hazards:  On or about August 7, 2024 an employee was exposed to fall hazards while working from a platform resting on the forks of the Yale Industrial Truck and the platform did not indicate the maximum work load including personnel and equipment, the weight of the empty platform, or the minimum capacity of the truck on which the platform could be used in accordance with ANSI B56.1-2012, American National Standard for Safety Standard for Low Lift and High Lift Trucks, Sections 4.17.2, 4.17.3, and 7.37.3.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5646
  • — Z (S) $11292

1910.140 C12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8067.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.140(c)(12): The employer did not ensure that anchorages used to attach to personal fall protection equipment are independent of any anchorage used to suspend employees or platforms on which employees work. The employer did not ensure that anchorages used to attach to personal fall protection equipment on mobile work platforms on powered industrial trucks are attached to an overhead member of the platform, at a point located above and near the center of the platform.  On or about August 7, 2024, employees working from a platform on the Yale Industrial fork truck were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not ensure that anchorages used to attach to personal fall protection equipment were independent of any anchorage used to suspend employees or platforms on which employees work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.140 D02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.140(d)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that personal fall arrest systems were rigged in such a manner that the employee cannot free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) or contact a lower level. A free fall may be more than 6 feet (1.8 m) provided the employer can demonstrate the manufacturer designed the system to allow a free fall of more than 6 feet and tested the system to ensure a maximum arresting force of 1,800 pounds (8 kN) is not exceeded:  On or about August 7, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working from an elevated platform on a Yale Industrial fork truck and the employer did not ensure that personal fall arrest systems were rigged in such a manner that the employee cannot free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) or contact a lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9680.00 · Current $4840.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:   On or about August 7, 2024, employees were operating two Yale Industrial Order Selectors and the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4840
  • — Z (S) $9680

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service and such examination shall be made daily:   On or about August 7, 2024, employees were operating two Yale Industrial Order Selectors and the employer did not ensure that daily checks were being conducted on the trucks prior to their operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347671281.