OSHA Inspection: LUIS TAMAY

Issued

Dec 12, 2024

Penalty

Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:(a)  a. On or about August 8, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee on the ground cleaning up below employees performing roofing operations installing weather guard and shingles was not wearing a hard hat to protect against falling materials.

Issued

Dec 12, 2024

Penalty

Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a. On or about August 8, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a pneumatic nail gun did not wear safety glasses, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with eye injuries.

Issued

Dec 12, 2024

Penalty

Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): (a)    a. On or about August 8, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite,  an employee performing residential roofing operations, seven (7') feet ten (10") inches above the ground, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.  b. On or about August 8, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, eight (8') feet seven (7") inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.  c. On or about August 8, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing residential roofing operations, fourteen (14') feet above the ground, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.