Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALEX ELISEO MACARIO REYNOSO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALEX ELISEO MACARIO REYNOSO in 602 RIDGELAWN AVENUE, HAMILTON, OH 45013 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347684631.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alex Eliseo Macario Reynoso — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alex Eliseo Macario Reynoso is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
602 RIDGELAWN AVENUE
City
HAMILTON
State
OH
ZIP
45013
Mailing
505 CONCORD LANE, WEST CHESTER, OH 45241
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2024
Abate by
Sep 20, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a) On or about July 02, 2024, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing activities on a residential home were utilizing a fall protection system. As a result, employees were exposed to fall heights of 11'2".
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2024
Abate by
Oct 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): Training program. The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a) On or before July 02, 2024, the employer failed to provide a training program and training for employees exposed to a fall hazard of  11'2" while performing re-roofing work on a residential home.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2024
Abate by
Sep 20, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  a) On or about July 02, 2024, the employer failed to ensure that the ladders being utilized by employees performing roofing activities to access the roof was extended 3 feet above the upper landing surface. As a result, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 11'2".
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347684631.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.