Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONNELLY, TIEHEN & SONS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONNELLY, TIEHEN & SONS, INC. in 4633 WEST HOMEFIELD DRIVE, SIOUX FALLS, SD 57106 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347728107.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Connelly, Tiehen & Sons, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Connelly, Tiehen & Sons, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4633 WEST HOMEFIELD DRIVE
City
SIOUX FALLS
State
SD
ZIP
57106
Mailing
300 CENTENNIAL DRIVE SUITE 200, NORTH SIOUX CITY, SD 57049
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2024
Abate by
Jan 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,687 · Current $3,687
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1):Employees on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six or more feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level were not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall protection system:  (a)Connelly, Tiehen & Sons, Inc. at 4633 West Homefield Drive, Sioux Falls, SD 57106: On or about and at times prior to August 28, 2024, the  employer did not ensure that employees working on the roof of the commercial  building conducting framing operations were protected from fall hazards by use of an appropriate fall protection system. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards greater than six feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3687
  • — Z (S) $3687

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2024
Abate by
Jan 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii):Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  (a)Connelly, Tiehen & Sons, Inc. at 4633 West Homefield Drive, Sioux Falls, SD 57106: On or about and at times prior to August 28, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees working on the roof of the commercial building were protected from fall hazards in that an employee attached a Guardian Vertical Lifeline Assembly ("VLA") to a 2x4 temporary support by wrapping the fall arrestor extension lanyard around the 2x4 and clipping the fall arrestor snap hook to the rope lifeline. This configuration held the fall arrestor eyelet in the open position that could not arrest the rope lifeline in the event of a fall. This condition exposed an employee to fall hazards.   (b)Connelly, Tiehen & Sons, Inc. at 4633 West Homefield Drive, Sioux Falls, SD 57106: On or about and at times prior to August 28, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees working on the roof of the commercial building were protected from fall hazards in that an employee did not adjust the Guardian Vertical Lifeline Assembly ("VLA") fall arrestor to their work area to reduce the slack rope lifeline in the system. An employee was observed with excess slack rope lifeline that in conjunction with the shock absorber would not limit an employees free fall to not more than 6 feet in the event of a fall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2024
Abate by
Jan 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D17

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2024
Abate by
Jan 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17):The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  (a)Connelly, Tiehen & Sons, Inc. at 4633 West Homefield Drive, Sioux Falls, SD 57106: On or about and at times prior to August 28, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees working on the roof of the commercial building were protected from fall hazards in that employees using fall protection systems did not locate the D-rings of the fall protection harnesses in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347728107.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.