Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JACAM CATALYST, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of JACAM CATALYST, LLC in 11999 TEXAS 158, GARDENDALE, TX 79758 (NAICS 424690). OSHA activity number 347729899.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jacam Catalyst, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jacam Catalyst, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JACAM CATALYST, LLC
Site address
11999 TEXAS 158
City
GARDENDALE
State
TX
ZIP
79758
Mailing
11999 E US HIGHWAY 158, GARDENDALE, TX 79758
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424690
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 F06

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $10,372 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6):The employer used written materials, such as signs, placards, process sheets, or batch tickets in lieu of affixing labels to individual stationary process containers that failed to identify the container(s) to which they were applicable and did not convey the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5):  a.) On or about September 3, 2024 and at times prior thereto, in the acid room, employees using waste containers containing  acids and chloroform were not labeled with the name of chemical and potential hazards.   b.) On or about September 3, 2024 and at times prior thereto, in the acid room fume hood #4, employees using glass containers containing  xylene and acids were not labeled with the name of chemical and potential hazards.   c.) On or about September 3, 2024 and at times prior thereto, in the acid room fume hood #5, employees using glass containers containing chlorinated solvents were not labeled with the name of chemical and potential hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10372

1910.1450 E03 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $10,372 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1450(e)(3)(iii): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include a requirement that fume hoods and other protective equipment functioned properly and did not include specific measures that would be taken to ensure proper and adequate performance of such equipment:  a.)  On or about September 3, 2024, the employer did not ensure fume hoods #4 and #5 and other protective equipment was functioning properly. This condition exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10372

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347729899.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.