Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FENWALL, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FENWALL, LLC in 13929 LYNMAR BLVD, TAMPA, FL 33626 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 347734592.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fenwall, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fenwall, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FENWALL, LLC
Site address
13929 LYNMAR BLVD
City
TAMPA
State
FL
ZIP
33626
Mailing
13929 LYNMAR BLVD, TAMPA, FL 33626
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2025
Abate by
Mar 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) At 13929 Lynmar Blvd Tampa, Florida: On or about September 5, 2024, the employer did not develop and implement a written worksite specific respiratory protection program for employees provided and required to use tight-fitting facepiece respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2025
Abate by
Mar 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) At 13929 Lynmar Blvd Tampa, Florida: On or about September 5, 2024, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine each employees' ability to use a respiratory protection before requiring use, in that, employees involved in grinding cement floors were provided and required to use tight-fitting facepiece respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 3, 2025
Abate by
Mar 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  (a)At 13929 Lynmar Blvd Tampa, Florida: On or about September 5, 2024 , the employer did not provide a fit test to employees involved in grinding concrete floor slabs who were provided and required to wear tight-fitting respiratory protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347734592.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.