Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: 100K CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of 100K CONSTRUCTION LLC in 1504 DREXEL BLVD, SOUTH MILWAUKEE, WI 53172 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347737728.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 100K Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 100K Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1504 DREXEL BLVD
City
SOUTH MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53172
Mailing
1306 COMO AVE, SAINT PAUL, MN 55108
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2024
Abate by
Oct 15, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)   (a) On or about September 5 2024,  the employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the job site to ensure that hazardous conditions were identified and corrected.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) On or about September 5, 2024, employees were performing clean up on the ground without a hard hat on while other employees were installing shingles on the roof above, exposing the employee to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  (a) On or about September 5, 2024, employees were performing roofing work with pneumatic nail guns without the use of eye protection, exposing them to possible danger of eye injury from flying objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a) On or about September 5, 2024, employees conducting tear off work on the residential roof with a 4:12 pitch, were not using fall protection. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet from roof to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2024
Abate by
Oct 29, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   (a) On or about September 5 2024, employees who were performing roofing work on a two story residential house did not have fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   (a) On or about September 5 2024, employees were accessing/egressing existing residential roof from a ladder which did not extend three feet above the upper landing surface. This exposed employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347737728.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.