Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BIO-GRO WI, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BIO-GRO WI, LLC in 699 EAGLE AVENUE, GRAND MARSH, WI 53936 (NAICS 325314). OSHA activity number 347752503.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bio-Gro WI, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bio-Gro WI, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BIO-GRO WI, LLC
Site address
699 EAGLE AVENUE
City
GRAND MARSH
State
WI
ZIP
53936
Mailing
699 EAGLE AVENUE, GRAND MARSH, WI 53936
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325314
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 E02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,828 · Current $4,080 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that steps are uniformly spaced and arranged, with a rise of not more than 10 inches (25 cm) and a depth of not less than 7 inches (18 cm). The employer did not ensure that the slope of the step stringer to which the steps are attached is not more than 60 degrees, measured from the horizontal.  On or about August 22, 2024, an employee utilized a mobile platform ladder that had been altered from the original design exposing the employee to a fall hazard. The mobile platform ladder was equipped with an additional step on the platform exceeding 10 inches and the slope of the step was more than 60 degrees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4079.6
  • — Z (S) $5828

1910.25 B03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2024
Abate by
Jan 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,113 · Current $2,879 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.25(b)(3): 29 CFR 1910.25(b)(3) The employer did not ensure that stairs have uniform riser heights and tread depths between landings.   On or about August 12, 2024, the employees working on the mixer platform were exposed to tripping hazards due to the stair case leading up to the platform did not have uniform riser heights.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2879.1
  • — Z (S) $4113

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2024
Abate by
Jan 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,113 · Current $2,879 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  On or about September 12, 2024, employees were exposed to an unprotected side that was 4 feet or more above a working level while working around the Netal Pit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2879.1
  • — Z (S) $4113

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2024
Abate by
Jan 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,857 · Current $4,800 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about September 12, 2024, the written respiratory protection program was not established and implemented for employees required to wear a tight-fitting, filtering-facepiece N95 respirator working inside the warehouses at the establishment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4799.9
  • — Z (S) $6857

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2024
Abate by
Jan 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about September 12, 2024 the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employees required to wear a tight-fitting, filtering-facepiece N95 respirator in the warehouses at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2024
Abate by
Jan 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about September 12, 2024, the employer failed to provide fit tests for employees required to wear a tight-fitting, filtering-facepiece N95 respirator in the warehouses at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2024
Abate by
Jan 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  On or about September 12, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees required to wear a tight-fitting, filtering-facepiece N95 respirator did not have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2024
Abate by
Jan 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  On or about September 12, 2024 the employer did not provide respirator training to employees required to wear a tight-fitting, filtering-facepiece N95 respirator in the warehouses at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347752503.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.