Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEW IMAGE CONSTRUCTION CORP

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of NEW IMAGE CONSTRUCTION CORP in CORNER OF BROADWAY AVENUE AND N. 9TH STREET, MATTOON, IL 61938 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347788150.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch NEW Image Construction Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NEW Image Construction Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
CORNER OF BROADWAY AVENUE AND N. 9TH STREET
City
MATTOON
State
IL
ZIP
61938
Mailing
9030 E TROY AVE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46239
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 8 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $388 · Current $388
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  The employer did not provide certification to OSHA that the cited violations issued on November 14, 2024, had been abated.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2024
Abate by
Nov 14, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):  The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  On or about October 1, 2024, employees were exposed to eye and fall hazards on a residential construction site in Mattoon, Illinois.  The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees' activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2024
Abate by
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about October 1, 2024, employees were exposed to eye and fall hazards on a residential construction site in Mattoon, Illinois.  The employer did not have a competent person conducting frequent and periodic safety inspections at the residential construction site.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2024
Abate by
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):  The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about October 1, 2024, employees were exposed to eye hazards without eye protection, while using pneumatic guns, on a residential construction site in Mattoon, Illinois.   The employer did not provide employee training in order to provide the employees with the knowledge to recognize construction safety hazards, as well as the procedures to follow in order to minimize or eliminate those safety hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2024
Abate by
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  On or about October 1, 2024, employees were exposed to eye hazards without eye protection, while using pneumatic guns, on a residential construction site in Mattoon, Illinois.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2024
Abate by
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about October 1, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 10 feet and 13.5 feet without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Mattoon, Illinois.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2024
Abate by
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   On or about October 1, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 10 feet and 13.5 feet without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Mattoon, Illinois.   The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2024
Abate by
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   On or about October 1, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 10 feet, while accessing and exiting the roof via extension ladders that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Mattoon, Illinois.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2024
Abate by
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:   On or about October 1, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 10 feet, while accessing and exiting the roof via extension ladders that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Mattoon, Illinois.    The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards related to ladders, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View NEW Image Construction Corp's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347788150.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.