Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: ORTIZ HOME REMODELING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ORTIZ HOME REMODELING, INC. in 150 SUTTON STREET, NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347793374.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ortiz Home Remodeling, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ortiz Home Remodeling, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
150 SUTTON STREET
City
NORTH ANDOVER
State
MA
ZIP
01845
Mailing
14 FERN STREET, BROCKTON, MA 02301
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2025
Abate by
May 1, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toe boards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  Location: 150 Sutton Street, North Andover, MA  a) On or about 10/3/24, the employer did not ensure that employees working on a pitched roof were attached to fall protection equipment. An employee at the peak of the roof was wearing a personal fall arrest harness, but was not attached to fall protection equipment on the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $4965

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2025
Abate by
May 1, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17):The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  Location: 150 Sutton Street, North Andover, MA  a) On or about 10/3/24, the employer did not ensure that employees working on a pitched roof were attached to fall protection equipment at the attachment point on the center of the wearer's back. Employees attached a lanyard to the front of the personal fall arrest harness.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4256

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2025
Abate by
May 1, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Location: 150 Sutton Street, North Andover, MA  a) On or about 10/3/24, the employer did not ensure that employees working on a pitched roof were provided with adequate training on how to wear and utilize personal fall arrest harness systems. Employees were attached to the fronts of lanyards, and were improperly wearing personal fall arrest harnesses.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4256

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Location: 150 Sutton Street, North Andover, MA  a) On or about 10/3/24, the employer did not ensure that employees accessing a pitched roof were provided with safe access on and off the roof from a ladder. The ladder did not extend three feet above the surface being accessed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $4965

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347793374.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.