BILOXI, MS —
OSHA Inspection: M.A.C. CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M.A.C. CONSTRUCTION in NEXT TO 8701 TUCKER RD., BILOXI, MS 39530 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 347793523.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- M.A.C. CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- NEXT TO 8701 TUCKER RD.
- City
- BILOXI
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39530
- Mailing
- 144 MCCRANEY HUNT ROAD, LUCEDALE, MS 39452
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $2,661 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): (a) South side of building - On or about October 3, 2024, the employer instructed his employee to operate the all-terrain forklift with a man basket on the forks to lift employees up to the roofs edge to fasten the metal siding to the face of the building exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2661.45
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v):A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: (a) South side of building - On or about October 3, 2024, the employer instructed the two employees to working from the lifted man basket without the use of fall restraint system to attach metal siding to the building exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1520.75
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.602 C01 VIII A
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(A):The safety platform was not firmly secured to the lifting carriage and/or forks. Sout side of building - On or about October 3, 2024, the employer used a man basket that was not attached to the forks of the all-terrain forklift to lift employees to attach the metal siding exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1520.75
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.760 A01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $2,661 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1):Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems. Top of metal building - On or about October 3, 2024, the employer had employees working on top of the metal building applying the roof decking without the use of fall protection exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2661.45
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $2,661 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) North and south side of building - On or about October 3, 2024, the employer provided the employees an aluminum extension ladder to use to gain access to the roof of the building that did not extend 3 feet past the roof edge exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2661.45
- — Z (S) $4839
More inspections at M.A.C. Construction
View M.A.C. Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347793523.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.