PEEKSKILL, NY —
OSHA Inspection: UMC WEST CONSTRUCTION & LANDSCAPING
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UMC WEST CONSTRUCTION & LANDSCAPING in 1015 PARK ST., PEEKSKILL, NY 10566 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347800989.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UMC WEST CONSTRUCTION & LANDSCAPING
- Site address
- 1015 PARK ST.
- City
- PEEKSKILL
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10566
- Mailing
- 5 STEVENSON AVE., CORTLANDT MANOR, NY 10567
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Location: lower roof On or about: 10/7/24 a) An employee was throwing garbage into a trailer below. The employee was not protected from falling 12', to the ground below. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: Location: upper roof On or about: 10/7/24 a) Employees, engaged in roof flashing work, were not adequately protected from falling between18-30 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2024
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards: Location: entire site On or about: 10/7/24 a) Employees, exposed to fall hazards while engaged in garbage removal and flashing work, were not provided with fall protection training. Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2024
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary: location: entire site on or about: 10/7/24 a) Employees were using extension ladders to access the upper and lower roofs The employees were not provided with ladder safety training. Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: location: upper roof on or about: 10/7/24 a) Employees were using an extension ladder to access the upper roof. The ladder did not extend 3 feet above the parapet. location: lower roof on or about: 10/7/24 b) Employees were using an extension ladder to access the lower roof. The ladder did not extend 3 feet above the parapet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired: Location: lower roof On or about: 10/7/24 a) Employees used a metal extension ladder to access the lower roof. The ladder had a damaged rung. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2074
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347800989.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.