Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CURRY WATERPROOFING & MASONRY RESTORATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CURRY WATERPROOFING & MASONRY RESTORATION, INC. in 150 CHESTNUT STREET, PROVIDENCE, RI 02903 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 347801060.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Curry Waterproofing & Masonry Restoration, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Curry Waterproofing & Masonry Restoration, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
150 CHESTNUT STREET
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02903
Mailing
10 OLD BLISS STREET, REHOBOTH, MA 02769
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2024
Abate by
Feb 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,148 · Current $2,074 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.  a) Jobsite: On or about 10/8/2024, the employer did not establish and implement an adequate written respiratory protection program, where respirator use was required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2074
  • — Z (S) $4148

1910.134 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2024
Abate by
Feb 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(3): The employer did not designate a program administrator who was qualified by appropriate training or experience to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and to conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness.  a) Jobsite: On or about 10/8/2024, the employer did not designate a qualified program administrator to administer and oversee the respiratory protection program for employees that use elastomeric respirators and filtering facepieces (N95) in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2024
Abate by
Feb 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  a) Jobsite: On or about 10/8/2024, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine an employee's ability to use a respirator prior to requiring its use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2024
Abate by
Feb 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) Jobsite: On or about 10/8/2024, the employer allowed an employee with facial hair to wear a respirator, that interfered with the seal.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2024
Penalty
Initial $388 · Current $194 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.                a) Jobsite: On or about 10/8/2024, the employer did not create a written certification record verifying that employees received adequate fall protection training prior to employees being exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $194
  • — Z (O) $388

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347801060.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.