PALOS HEIGHTS, IL —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS TULENEMA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS TULENEMA in 12908 S. CYPRESS LN., PALOS HEIGHTS, IL 60463 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347805848.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS TULENEMA
- Site address
- 12908 S. CYPRESS LN.
- City
- PALOS HEIGHTS
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60463
- Mailing
- 4506 N. ALBANY AVE., APT #1, CHICAGO, IL 60625
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2025
- Abate by
- May 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $531 · Current $531
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about April 11, 2025, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 0100303/18/2025
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $531
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about October 9, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing roofing operations below employees on the roof above was not wearing a hard hat to protect against falling materials.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $5,675 · Current $5,675
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): (a) a. On or about October 9, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing operations at seven (7) feet six (6) inches above the ground were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards. b. On or about October 9, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing operations at seven (7) feet ten (10) inches above the ground were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards. c. On or about October 9, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing operations at twelve (12) feet six (6) inches above the ground were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5675
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,783 · Current $3,783
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about October 9, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees conducting roofing operations were not provided training on how to minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3783
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347805848.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.