NEW CANAAN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: G & B CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of G & B CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 116 MARSHALL RIDGE ROAD, NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347814386.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- G & B CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 116 MARSHALL RIDGE ROAD
- City
- NEW CANAAN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06840
- Mailing
- 59 GLENWOOD AVENUE, NORWALK, CT 06854
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns. Worksite: On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees who were working on the ground below roofing activities were provided with and required to wear head protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1773.5
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Worksite: On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use pneumatic nail guns while installing roofing shingles were provided with and required to use eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1773.5
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2025
- Abate by
- May 30, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not ensure that the ladder jack scaffold that was erected without fall protection was erected by a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2025
- Abate by
- May 30, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. Worksite: On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees who were required to work from a residential roof were provided with training that would enable the employees to recognize the hazards associated with working from heights.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2025
- Abate by
- May 30, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Worksite: On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use a damaged extension ladder to gain access to a roof were trained to recognize the hazards associated ladders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees who were required to perform roofing work from a ladder jack scaffold at a height above ten feet were provided with and required to use fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees who were required to work from a residential roof at a height above six feet, installing new roofing shingles were protected from falling by guardrail systems, a safety net system, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $1,064 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired. Worksite: On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not ensure that an extension ladder used to gain access to a roof was removed from service due to damaged rungs.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1064
- — Z (S) $2128
More inspections at G & B Construction, LLC
View G & B Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347814386.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.