PROVIDENCE, RI —
OSHA Inspection: JOAQUIN ROMERO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOAQUIN ROMERO in 159-161 INDIANA AVENUE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02905 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347815599.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOAQUIN ROMERO
- Site address
- 159-161 INDIANA AVENUE
- City
- PROVIDENCE
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02905
- Mailing
- 365 MAIN STREET, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated. (a) Establishment: As of May 21, 2025, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation 2, Item 1 from inspection number 1781559, issued on 12/30/2024, with a final order date of 4/15/2025.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- May 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) Establishment: As of January 4, 2022, the employer had not provided the required abatement documentation to OSHA for Citation 2, Item 1 from inspection number 1781559, issued on 12/30/2024, with a final order date of 4/15/2025.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. a) Jobsite: On or about 10/15/2024, an employee was not protected from falling or flying objects, while working on the ground below an employee on the roof, without a protective helmet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4148
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6). a) Scaffold: On or about 10/15/2024, the employer allowed an employee to erect a Pump-Jack Scaffold system that was less than 10 feet from live electrical wiring.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head. a) Jobsite: On or about 10/15/2024, the employer did not ensure that an employee connected their rope lanyard to a D-ring at the center of the wearers back, near their shoulder blades.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. a) Jobsite: On or about October 15, 2024, an employee was not protected from falling while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a) Jobsite: On or about October 15, 2024, the employer did not prepare a written fall protection training certificate for an employee who worked on a roof surface at heights of approximately 25 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $388
More inspections at Joaquin Romero
View Joaquin Romero's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347815599.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.