BROOKSHIRE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: PARKER GAS COMPANY, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PARKER GAS COMPANY, INC. in 30313 FM 529, BROOKSHIRE, TX 77423 (NAICS 454310). OSHA activity number 347821282.
Watch Parker GAS Company, INC. — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Parker GAS Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PARKER GAS COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 30313 FM 529
- City
- BROOKSHIRE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77423
- Mailing
- 30313 FARM TO MARKET ROAD 529, BROOKSHIRE, TX 77423
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 454310
- Employees
- 260
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9457.00 · Current $5674.00 Reduced
2150
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit". On or about October 18, 2024 and at prior times, at the RapidXchange Production Facility in Brookshire, Texas, the doorway on the east facing wall, of the office building, leading to the eastern side of the building and parking lot was not marked by a sign reading "Exit".
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5674.2
- — Z (S) $9457
1910.119 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $16550.00 · Current $9930.00 Reduced
2150
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119. (a) On or about October 16, 2024, at the RapidXchange facility in Brookshire, Texas, the employer did not conduct an initial process hazard analysis to address the propane process hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9930
- — Z (S) $16550
1910.119 F01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $16550.00 · Current $9930.00 Reduced
2150
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process. (a) On or about October 16, 2024, at the RapidXchange facility in Brookshire, Texas, the employer did not implement the propane evacuation of cylinders procedure as written.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9930
- — Z (S) $16550
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11823.00 · Current $7094.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the ongoing integrity of process equipment: (a) On October 16, 2024, and at times prior, at the RapidXchange facility in Brookshire, Texas, the employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the ongoing integrity of Pressure Vessel #1 containing 59,220 lbs. of propane. (b) On October 16, 2024, and at times prior, at the RapidXchange facility in Brookshire, Texas, the employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the ongoing integrity of Pressure Vessel #2 containing 88,992 lbs. of Propane.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7093.8
- — Z (S) $11823
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: (a) On October 16, 2024, and at times prior, at the RapidXchange facility in Brookshire, Texas, the employer did not follow Recognized and Generally Acceptable Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP) such as but not limited to, API 510 Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: In-service Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration, (2014) section 9.3.4 for external inspections, when they failed to perform an adequate inspection on Pressure Vessel tank #1 containing 59,220 lbs. of propane. (b) On October 16, 2024, and at times prior, at the RapidXchange facility in Brookshire, Texas, the employer did not follow Recognized and Generally Acceptable Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP) such as but not limited to, API 510 Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: In-service Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration, (2014) section 9.3.4 for external inspections, when they failed to perform an adequate inspection on Pressure Vessel tank #2 containing 88,992 lbs. of Propane. (c) On October 16, 2024, and at times prior, at the RapidXchange facility in Brookshire, Texas, the employer did not follow Recognized and Generally Acceptable Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP) such as but not limited to, API 570 Piping Inspection Code: In-service Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration of Piping Systems (2016) section 6.4 for Visual External Inspections, when it failed to perform adequate inspection on the process piping connected to pressure vessels containing propane.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.38 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(2): Procedures for emergency evacuation, including type of evacuation and exit route assignments were not implemented by the employer. On or about October 18, 2024, at the RapidXchange Production Facility in Brookshire, TX, the emergency evacuation posters were not hanging in the areas of the production facility where the workers could see and adhere to.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.38 C04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
2150
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(4): The employer did not establish procedures to account for all employees after an evacuation. On or about October 16, 2024, at the RapidXchange Production Facility, in Brookshire, TX, the employer did not have a secondary means of establishing accountability after a significant incident.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.38 D
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(d): The employer did not have and maintain an employee alarm system with a distinctive signal for each purpose so that it complied with the requirements of 1910.165. On or about October 16, 2024, at the RapidXchange Production Facility in Brookshire, Texas, the employer did maintain an alarm system with a distinctive signal for fire or other emergency situations that might occur.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 454310)
PLANT CITY, FL—2026-05-14
PROPANE NINJA
RIPPLEMEAD, VA—2026-04-30
RED FLAME OIL & PROPANE, INC.
FULTON, NY—2026-04-23
JOHNSTON'S PROPANE SERVICE
QUINCY, CA—2026-03-19
HUNT & SONS, LLC
INDIAN RIVER, MI—2026-03-06
BLARNEY CASTLE OIL CO.
More inspections in TX
SPRING, TX—2026-07-10
DORSTENER WIRE TECH INC.
FORT WORTH, TX—2026-07-10
RC PROFESSIONAL ROOFING OF TEXAS LLC
CYPRESS, TX—2026-07-10
FEDERICO CARVAJAL GARCIA
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-10
ED LONG'S METAL WORKS
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-09
WAREHOUSE RACK COMPANY, LP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347821282.