Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREENWAY PLASTICS LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GREENWAY PLASTICS LLC in 6718 LARIMER STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77020 (NAICS 326111). OSHA activity number 347824062.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Greenway Plastics LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Greenway Plastics LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6718 LARIMER STREET
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77020
Mailing
6718 LARIMER STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77020
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326111
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(1):Energy control program. The employer shall establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.  On or about October 13, 2024, employees were clearing a jam in a plastic film machine and the employer did not have an established control of hazardous energy program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6775.2
  • — Z (S) $11292

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.176(b):Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse:  On or about October 17, 2024, boxes of plastic bags and pallets of flat boxes were stored in tiers and were not stacked so that they were stable and secure against sliding and collapse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6775.2
  • — Z (S) $11292

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 12 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $4,840 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #1, employees used a roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  b.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #2, employees used a upper roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  c.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #2, employees used a lower roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  d.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #3, employees used a roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  e.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #4, employees used a upper roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  f.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #4, employees used a lower roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  g.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #6, employees used a roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  h.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #7, employees used a roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  i.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #8, employees used a roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  j.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #10, employees used a roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.  k.  On or about October 17, 2024, on film extrusion machine #11, employees used a roll coater that did not have a guard for a rotating shaft.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4840.2
  • — Z (S) $8067

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1904.39(a)(2):The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye.  On or about October 17, 2024, an employee�was hospitalized�after having a crushing injury on a machine without�the employer�reporting the�incident to�OSHA within�twenty-four (24)�hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $8067

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347824062.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.