CRANSTON, RI —
OSHA Inspection: JOSEPH PILKINGTON
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOSEPH PILKINGTON in 38-42 HAVEN AVENUE, CRANSTON, RI 02920 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347827818.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSEPH PILKINGTON
- Site address
- 38-42 HAVEN AVENUE
- City
- CRANSTON
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02920
- Mailing
- 180 NICHOLS ROAD, HARRISVILLE, RI 02830
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were not protected from falling or flying objects while working on the ground below roofers, without protective helmets.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4148
- — C (S) $4148
- — Z (S) $4148
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were not wearing protective glasses while stripping and installing a roof, exposing them to flying particles.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $2765
- — C (S) $2765
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.451 A01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1): Each scaffold and/or scaffold component was not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least 4 times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it. [29 CFR 1926 Subpart L, Appendix A(2)(k)]: Maximum intended load-25 lb/ft2. However, not more than two employees shall occupy any platform at any one time. Maximum span between supports shall be 8 feet. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, the employer permitted three employees to work from Ladder-Jack scaffolding platforms where the maximum span between supports was greater than eight feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4839
- — C (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.451 B02 I
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working from a wooden 2x10 ladder jack scaffold plank that was not at least 12" wide, when installing a roof, approximately 20'6" above the ground level.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6). a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were exposed to electrical hazards when the employer allowed employees to erect and work from a ladder jack scaffold platform using aluminum ladders that was less than ten feet from live electrical circuits.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20'6" while working from a ladder jack scaffold to install a roof, without any means of fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 K01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m). a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, the employer allowed employees to work from a ladder jack scaffold that was approximately 20'6" above the ground level.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4839
- — C (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.452 K05
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, the employer allowed employees to work from a ladder jack scaffold where the planks were bridged (overlapped) from one support to another.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4148
- — C (S) $4148
- — Z (S) $4148
1926.1053 B03
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(3): Ladders were loaded beyond the maximum intended load for which they are built. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, two employees were observed over-loading a portable extension ladder by climbing it with material, at the same time.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B21
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards while ascending a ladder while carrying roofing materials in one hand, which did not allow them to maintain three points of contact on the ladder at all times and an imbalance condition.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards when ascending a ladder, while carrying roofing materials that could have caused loss of balance.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $32,265 · Current $32,265
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working on a roof, approximately 20'6" above the lower level, without any means of fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $32265
- — C (W) $32265
- — Z (W) $32265
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees were trained to recognize the hazards associated with working on scaffolds.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $388
- — C (O) $388
- — Z (O) $388
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2024, the employer did not create a written certification record verifying that employees received adequate fall protection training for employees exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $388
- — C (O) $388
- — Z (O) $388
More inspections at Joseph Pilkington
View Joseph Pilkington's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347827818.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.