PORTLAND, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: BROTHERS ROOFING AND CARPENTRY INC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of BROTHERS ROOFING AND CARPENTRY INC in 1105 WASHINGTON AVE, PORTLAND, ME 04101 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347833410.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BROTHERS ROOFING AND CARPENTRY INC
- Site address
- 1105 WASHINGTON AVE
- City
- PORTLAND
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04101
- Mailing
- 2 GERRY AVENUE, SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation had been abated: Portland, Maine - The employer failed to certify abatement of Citation 1 Items 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $398
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is completed for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. Portland, Maine - The employer failed to certify abatement of Citation 1 Items 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $398
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: Roof - On or about October 22, 2024, the employer did not ensure all employees were connected to the harness attachment point, located on their upper back.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.502 D21
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: Worksite - On or about October 22, 2024, the employer failed to ensure personal fall arrest systems were inspected prior to use, as evidenced by fraying ropes and knots in lanyards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer: Worksite - On or about October 22, 2024, the employer was unable to verify fall protection training for employees wearing fall protection and conducting roofing activities, over 21 feet above the ground.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.552 A01
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators: Worksite - The employer did not ensure the material hoist was used according to the manufacturer's specifications and limitations, in that employees were climbing the hoist.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347833410.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.