SMITHFIELD, RI —
OSHA Inspection: FIRST CHOICE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FIRST CHOICE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. in 21 WATERVIEW DRIVE, SMITHFIELD, RI 02917 (NAICS 531311). OSHA activity number 347844300.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FIRST CHOICE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Site address
- 21 WATERVIEW DRIVE
- City
- SMITHFIELD
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02917
- Mailing
- 48 HAMLET AVENUE, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 531311
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $5,531 · Current $2,766 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. a) Jobsite: On or about October 28, 2024, an employee was exposed to struck-by hazards while operating power tools without protective eyewear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2765.5
- — Z (S) $5531
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,452 · Current $3,226 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated. a) Jobsite: On or about October 25, 2024, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while working from an aerial boom lift, approximately 19 feet in height, without any means of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3226
- — Z (S) $6452
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $518 · Current $259 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. a) Jobsite: On or about October 28, 2024, the employer did not prepare a written fall protection training certificate for an employee working from an aerial lift, exposed to falls greater than 15 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $259
- — Z (O) $518
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 531311)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347844300.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.