Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FREDDY PERALTA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FREDDY PERALTA in 17549 KARLI LANE, ORLAND PARK, IL 60462 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347851362.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Freddy Peralta — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Freddy Peralta is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FREDDY PERALTA
Site address
17549 KARLI LANE
City
ORLAND PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60462
Mailing
244 N. HARVARD AVE., VILLA PARK, IL 60181
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Jun 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $531 · Current $531
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.   a. On or about May 7, 2025, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected:  Citation Number                                                Item Number                                    Abatement Date                  02                                                                     001                                                     04/07/2025
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $531

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $5,675 · Current $5,675
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b)  a. On or about October 29, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, thirteen (13) feet two (2) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.  b. On or about October 29, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, ten (10) feet zero (0) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5675

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $5,675 · Current $5,675
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  a. On or about October 29, 2024, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface nor was it secured at the top, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5675

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,783 · Current $3,783
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:(a)  a) On October  29, 2024, an employee was observed using material hoist ladder as a ladder to access and egress the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3783

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:   a) On October 29, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to the hazard of falling approximately 10 feet when climbing a portable ladder carrying material to the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2025
Abate by
Apr 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a. On or about October 29, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347851362.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.