DEERBROOK, WI —
OSHA Inspection: GEORGE KITSEMBLE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GEORGE KITSEMBLE in 1100 PARK STREET, DEERBROOK, WI 54424 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347865016.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GEORGE KITSEMBLE
- Site address
- 1100 PARK STREET
- City
- DEERBROOK
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54424
- Mailing
- W8500 ROCKY ROAD, DEERBROOK, WI 54424
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The employer failed to provide certification of abatement related to the fall protection citation that was issued on November 14, 2024.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $398
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2024
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. On or about September 26, 2024, at an establishment located at 1100 Park Street in Gresham, Wisconsin, an employee of Kitsemble Exteriors was performing re-roofing activities with no form of conventional fall protection while exposed to fall hazards of over 8 feet. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2765
- — Z (S) $2765
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347865016.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.