DEXTER, ME —
OSHA Inspection: AMI FRAMING
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AMI FRAMING in 12 CHURCH STREET, DEXTER, ME 04930 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 347876369.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMI FRAMING
- Site address
- 12 CHURCH STREET
- City
- DEXTER
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04930
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 225, DEXTER, ME 04930
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights were not on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundations: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, where the poles were in direct contact with the ground without a mud sill.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.451 C02 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, and the poles were not on level and sound footing. The left pole footing was sitting on a side hill at an approximate 23.8-degree angle, and all pole footings were not on rigid footing which caused them to sink into the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffold and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift and after any occurrence which could affect the scaffold's structural integrity: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, and the scaffold and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person daily before use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,012 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along open sides and ends of platforms: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, and a guardrail system was not installed on the ends of the platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2012
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 G04 II
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(ii): The top rail on a scaffold was not installed between 38 and 45 inches above the platform surface: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, and the top rail was installed at approximately 32 inches above the platform surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G04 III
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(iii): Mid-rails were not installed between the top rail and the platform surface: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, and a mid-rail was not installed on the scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B03
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of the platforms was more than 14 inches from the face of the work and guardrail systems and/or personal fall arrest systems were not used to protect employees from falling: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, with the scaffold platform up to 18 7/8 inches from the face of the structure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles of pump jack scaffold(s) were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing, or equivalent, at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, and the poles were not secured at the bottom.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.451 C03
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement: Worksite - Employees were permitted to work on a pump jack scaffold system, as high as 22 feet above the lower level, and the poles were not plumb.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work: Worksite - The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting and disassembling scaffolding trained by a competent person in all the requirements outlined in 1926.454(b)(1) - (b)(4).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter: Worksite - The employer did not have each employee who performed work on a scaffolding trained in all the requirements outlined in 1926.454(a)(1) - (a)(5).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347876369.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.