Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MJA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP

Special Programs inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a special Programs safety inspection of MJA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP in 86/88 HIGH ST., GREENFIELD, MA 01301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347876815.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MJA General Construction Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MJA General Construction Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
86/88 HIGH ST.
City
GREENFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
01301
Mailing
6 OTIS STREET APT 2, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Special Programs (K)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  86/88 High St. Greenfield, MA: On or about November 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees using pneumatic nail guns were protected from flying particles during a residential construction project that involved shingle replacement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  86/88 High St. Greenfield, MA: On or about November 13, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet 7 inches and 20 feet above a lower level while performing residential construction work and were not protected from falling by guard rail systems, safety net systems, or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4965
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  86/88 High St. Greenfield, MA: On or about November 13, 2024, the employer had not trained employees who were exposed to fall hazards while performing work on a roof, to recognize fall hazards and on the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2025
Abate by
Apr 22, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  86/88 High St. Greenfield, MA: On or about November 13, 2024, the employer had not prepared a written certification record of fall protection training which included the name or other identity of the person trained, the signature of the person trained, date(s) the training was completed and the signature of the person who conducted the training for six employees who were performing work on a residential roof and exposed to fall hazards of over 9 feet 7 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  86/88 High St. Greenfield, MA: On or about November 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees using ladders to access heights of approximately 9 feet 7 inches above the ground below, had the ladder rails extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4965
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  86/88 High St. Greenfield, MA 01301: On or about November 13, 2024, the employer had not ensured that ladders being used to access a residential roof were used only for the purposes they were designed.  A material hoist (shingle lift) ladder, not designed for climbing, was used by an employee to descend from a rooftop that was approximately 20 feet high while performing shingle replacement activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladder(s) were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and/or after an occurrence that could have affected their safe use:  86/88 High St. Greenfield, MA: On or about November 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that a ladder used to access a 9 foot 11-inch-high landing surface had been inspected for visible damage prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2837

View MJA General Construction Corp's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347876815.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.