NEW CITY, NY —
OSHA Inspection: LGJ CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LGJ CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 16 STERN PL., NEW CITY, NY 10956 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347885147.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LGJ CONSTRUCTION CORP.
- Site address
- 16 STERN PL.
- City
- NEW CITY
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10956
- Mailing
- 7 RHEINLANDER LANE, NEW CITY, NY 10956
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: location: entire site on or about: 11/14/24 a) Employees were engaged in residential roofing work. The employees were not provided with safety training. Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $1,490 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Location: below roof On or about: 11/14/24 a) An employee, who was working below overhead hazards related to roofing work, was not provided with a hard hat. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1490
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $3,480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Location: roof On or about: 11/14/24 a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing work, were not provided with fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 18-19 feet. Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3480
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards: Location: entire site On or about: 11/14/24 a) Employees, exposed to fall hazards while engaged in roofing work, were not provided with fall protection training. Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $3,480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24 a) Employees were gaining access to and from the roof using an extension ladder that only extended above the roof eave by a few inches. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3480
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary: location: entire site on or about: 8/15/24 a) Employees were using extension ladders while engaged in roofing work. The employees were not provided with ladder safety training. Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $1,490 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24 a) Employees were using a portable metal extension ladder to access the roof. The lanyard, connecting the 2 flys of the ladder, was missing. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1490
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $1,980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired: location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24 a) Employees were using a portable metal extension ladder to access the roof. The ladders was bent and had a damaged rung. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1980
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.1053 B21
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $2,480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder: location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24 a) Employees were using an extension ladder to access the roof. The employees did not have at least one hand grasp the ladder when progressing up the ladder. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2480
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24 a) An employee was using an extension ladder to access the roof. The employee was carrying shingles in a way that could cause him to lose balance and fall. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347885147.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.