Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LGJ CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LGJ CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 16 STERN PL., NEW CITY, NY 10956 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347885147.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch LGJ Construction Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for LGJ Construction Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
16 STERN PL.
City
NEW CITY
State
NY
ZIP
10956
Mailing
7 RHEINLANDER LANE, NEW CITY, NY 10956
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Abate by
Apr 1, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  location: entire site on or about: 11/14/24  a) Employees were engaged in residential roofing work. The employees were not provided with safety training.   Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,128 · Current $1,490 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Location: below roof On or about: 11/14/24  a) An employee, who was working below overhead hazards related to roofing work, was not provided with a hard hat.   NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1490
  • — Z (S) $2128

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $3,480 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Location: roof On or about: 11/14/24  a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing work, were not provided with fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 18-19 feet.      Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3480
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Abate by
Apr 1, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards:  Location: entire site On or about: 11/14/24  a) Employees, exposed to fall hazards while engaged in roofing work, were not provided with fall protection training.    Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $3,480 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24  a) Employees were gaining access to and from the roof using an extension ladder that only extended above the roof eave by a few inches.    NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3480
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Abate by
Apr 1, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary:  location: entire site on or about: 8/15/24    a) Employees were using extension ladders while engaged in roofing work. The employees were not provided with ladder safety training.   Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to provide abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,128 · Current $1,490 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24  a) Employees were using a portable metal extension ladder to access the roof. The lanyard, connecting the 2 flys of the ladder, was missing.  NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1490
  • — Z (S) $2128

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:  location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24  a) Employees were using a portable metal extension ladder to access the roof. The ladders was bent and had a damaged rung.   NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1980
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.1053 B21

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $2,480 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder:  location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24  a) Employees were using an extension ladder to access the roof.  The employees did not have at least one hand grasp the ladder when progressing up the ladder.    NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2480
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.1053 B22

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:  location: back of house on or about: 11/14/24  a) An employee was using an extension ladder to access the roof.  The employee was carrying shingles in a way that could cause him to lose balance and fall.    NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347885147.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.