Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VISION MACHINE, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VISION MACHINE, INC. in 25045 SPRING RIDGE DR., SPRING, TX 77386 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 347886525.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vision Machine, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vision Machine, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
25045 SPRING RIDGE DR.
City
SPRING
State
TX
ZIP
77386
Mailing
25045 SPRING RIDGE DR., SPRING, TX 77386
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
May 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $2,837 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(1):The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  On or about November 18, 2024, and times prior thereto, in the Machine Shop, employees performed maintenance and servicing work on CNC lathes and bandsaws without having an energy control program that included energy control procedures, employee training, and periodic inspections.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2837.4
  • — Z (S) $4729

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
May 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $3,972 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  On or about November 18, 2024, and at times prior thereto, in the Machine Shop:  A.  Employees operated a Hem Saw Cyclone bandsaw without the unused portion of the blade being guarded. B.  Employees operated a  Le Blond 4025-32 manual lathe without one or more methods of machine guarding. C.  Employees operated a  Tuda manual lathe without one or more methods of machine guarding.  D.  Employees operated a  Lehman Hydratrol lathe without one or more methods of machine guarding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3972
  • — Z (S) $6620

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
May 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii):Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  On or about November 18, 2024, and at times prior thereto, in the Machine Shop Area, employees operated a Bridgeport milling machine without a point of operation guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Mar 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:   On or about November 18, 2024, and at times prior thereto, throughout the facility,  employees were required to operate forklifts to move material without being evaluated at least every three years, to ensure they could do so safely.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347886525.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.