WAKEFIELD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: LMM CONSTRUCTION INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of LMM CONSTRUCTION INC. in 5 LASSELL STREET, WAKEFIELD, MA 01880 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347886780.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LMM CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 5 LASSELL STREET
- City
- WAKEFIELD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01880
- Mailing
- 218 BROADWAY, HAVERHILL, MA 01830
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jul 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. Location- Jobsite On or about May 31, 2025, the employer did not provide corrective action documentation as cited in Citation 1, Item 1a and as agreed upon in Item 11 of the Informal Settlement Agreement signed by the employer on March 14, 2025.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2025
- Abate by
- May 30, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. Location - Work place and or company headquarters. On or about November 15, 2025, three employees were not trained in safe work practices, the recognition of hazards and avoidance of unsafe conditions.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4965
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation. Location - Worksite. On or about November 15, 2024, two employees were on a pump jack scaffold system that had supports which did not have baseplates, mudsills, or other adequate firm foundation.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4965
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Location - Worksite. On or about November 15, 2024, two employees were exposed to fall hazards on a pump jack scaffold that had were not secured at the bottom of the support poles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Location - Worksite. On or about November 15, 2024, three employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than sixteen feet above lower level from a residential roof where fall protection was not used.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4965
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.552 A01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $2,128
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators. Location - Worksite. On or about November 15, 2024, two employees were using a material lift as a ladder to access an upper level.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2128
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder. Location - Worksite. On or about November 15, 2024, three employees were using a non-self supporting ladder that was set up at the incorrect angle.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4965
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347886780.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.