CASTLETON ON HUDSON, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: SJN, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SJN, INC. in 1666 COLUMBIA TURNPIKE, CASTLETON ON HUDSON, NY 12033 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347890048.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SJN, INC.
- Site address
- 1666 COLUMBIA TURNPIKE
- City
- CASTLETON ON HUDSON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12033
- Mailing
- 24 CAROL ANN DRIVE, ALBANY, NY 12205
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Worksite, ground: On or about November 20, 2024, an employee was picking up roofing debris on the ground while other employees were removing roofing material overhead and was not protected by a protective helmet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3547
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation. a) Worksite, 1st-floor roof: On or about November 20, 2024, an employee was operating a pneumatic nail gun to install roofing material without the use of eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3547
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) Worksite, 1st -floor roof: On or about November 19, 2024, employees were replacing a roof on a commercial building, approximately 15 feet above the ground, and were not protected from falling. The employees were not wearing harnesses, nor did they have a lanyard or anchor point. b) Worksite, 1st-floor roof: On or about November 20, 2024, employees were replacing a roof on a commercial building, approximately 15 feet above the ground, and were not protected from falling. The employees were not wearing harnesses, nor did they have a lanyard or anchor point.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4965
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) Worksite, 1st -floor roof: On or about November 19, 2024, employees were replacing a roof on a commercial building, approximately 15 feet above the ground, and were not trained on the hazards of falling. The employees were not wearing harnesses, nor did they have a lanyard or anchor point. b) Worksite, 1st -floor roof: On or about November 20, 2024, employees were replacing a roof on a commercial building, approximately 15 feet above the ground, and were not trained on the hazards of falling. The employees were not wearing harnesses, nor did they have a lanyard or anchor point.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4965
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347890048.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.