PORTLAND, ME —
OSHA Inspection: BRISTOL SEAFOOD INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRISTOL SEAFOOD INC. in 5 PORTLAND FISH PIER, PORTLAND, ME 04112 (NAICS 311710). OSHA activity number 347900755.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRISTOL SEAFOOD INC.
- Site address
- 5 PORTLAND FISH PIER
- City
- PORTLAND
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04112
- Mailing
- 5 PORTLAND FISH PIER, PORTLAND, ME 04112
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311710
- Employees
- 84
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,857 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: Establishment - The employer did not conduct periodic inspections, at least annually, of lockout tagout energy control procedures, including the review of authorized employees and their responsibilities regarding the lockout tagout procedure being inspected.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $6857
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,113 · Current $2,468 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory-installed attachments, however, the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: Establishment - The Crown S200 Series, fitted with a Bolzoni Auramo rotating attachment, was not equipped with a data plate containing revised capacities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2467.8
- — Z (S) $4113
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,857 · Current $4,114 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: Scallop Processing Area - The Employer was charging a Crown Pallet Stacker with a severely damaged cord in a wet environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4114.2
- — Z (S) $6857
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,857 · Current $4,114 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Establishment - Employees were exposed to accident contact with charged 120 Volt electric wires due to missing guards/covers in the flowing instances: a) The elevator controls on the Rotex defrosting machine were missing a button cover. b) A junction box on the fillet machine used to power lights was missing a cover.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4114.2
- — Z (S) $6857
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: Establishment - The employer allowed the use of a Crown electric pallet jack without conducting an inspection before use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage: Employer did not ensure that the areas in front of energized knife switches were cleared of material, in the flowing instances: a) The 220-volt knife switch, in the access to the fillet freezer area for the overhead door, was blocked by pallets of products. b) The 220-volt knife switch, in the current storage area for the overhead door, was blocked by old equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: Fillet Processing Area - One laser positioning device was powered by an extension cord in place for over 90 days.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Bristol Seafood INC.
View Bristol Seafood INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311710)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347900755.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.