Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ATLAS UNIVERSAL ROOFING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ATLAS UNIVERSAL ROOFING, INC. in 11415 HUGHES RD, DICKINSON, TX 77539 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347900953.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Atlas Universal Roofing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Atlas Universal Roofing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11415 HUGHES RD
City
DICKINSON
State
TX
ZIP
77539
Mailing
735 W TIDWELL RD, HOUSTON, TX 77091
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2025
Abate by
Feb 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $2,903 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) (Construction Reference 1926.59):  a) On or about November 25, 2024, at the job site, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals used at the workplace including roofing asphalt, a carcinogen, when employees performed roofing construction work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2903.4
  • — Z (S) $4839

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2025
Abate by
Feb 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  a) On or about November 25, 2024, at the job site, the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals used at the workplace including roofing asphalt, a carcinogen, when employees performed roofing construction work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2025
Abate by
Feb 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system; or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, the use of a safety monitoring system alone:  a) On or about November 25, 2024, on the rooftop, employees were performing roofing construction work at heights greater than 6 feet without adequate fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6775.2
  • — Z (S) $11292

1926.502 F01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2025
Abate by
Feb 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(i): When no mechanical equipment was being used, the warning line was not erected at least 6 feet (1.8m) from the roof edge:  a) On or about November 25, 2024, on the rooftop, the warning line was erected less than 6 feet from the roof edge when employees performed roofing construction work at heights greater than 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2025
Abate by
Feb 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,453 · Current $3,872 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section:  a) On or about November 25, 2024, on the roof, DeWalt DWE402W handheld angle grinders were used to grind concrete walls without water delivery system or dust collection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3871.8
  • — Z (S) $6453

1926.1153 D02 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2025
Abate by
Feb 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a) On or about November 25, 2024, on the roof, the employer did not assess employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica when employees used DeWalt DWE402W handheld angle grinders to grind concrete walls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01 II

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2025
Abate by
Feb 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)(ii): The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task:  a) On or about November 25, 2024, at the job site, the employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan that contained a description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task specific to the employer's operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347900953.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.