Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCEPIERRE FOODS, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ADVANCEPIERRE FOODS, INC. in 9990 PRINCETON GLENDALE RD, WEST CHESTER, OH 45069 (NAICS 311412). OSHA activity number 347904096.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advancepierre Foods, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advancepierre Foods, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9990 PRINCETON GLENDALE RD
City
WEST CHESTER
State
OH
ZIP
45069
Mailing
9990 PRINCETON GLENDALE RD, WEST CHESTER, OH 45069
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311412
Employees
757
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Oct 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $13,005 · Current $13,005

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(e)(1):The employer shall perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by this standard. The process hazard analysis shall be appropriate to the complexity of the process and shall identify, evaluate, and control the hazards involved in the process. Employers shall determine and document the priority order for conducting process hazard analyses based on a rationale which includes such considerations as extent of the process hazards, number of potentially affected employees, age of the process, and operating history of the process.  a.) As of and prior to November 21, 2024, the employer's process hazard analysis (PHA) was not appropriate to the complexity of the process and did not identify, evaluate, and control the hazards involved in the 3 ammonia refrigeration systems of mechanical room #1.  The 2017 PHA and 2021 PHA Revalidation only addressed generic equipment in a generic ammonia refrigeration process, such as compressors, evaporators, pressure vessels, condensers and instruments and this generic approach did not identify, evaluate, and control the hazards from variations in equipment design, safe upper and lower operating and design limits, and operating and maintenance procedures for the types of equipment involved in the mechanical room #1 covered process. Due to the continued operation of a process which has not appropriately identified, evaluated, and controlled the hazards of the process by a PHA, employees have increased risk for exposure to ammonia released from the system(s) leading to corrosive injuries, burns or struck by injuries from fires and explosions, or death.  b.) As of and prior to November 21, 2024, the employer's process hazard analysis (PHA) was not appropriate to the complexity of the process and did not identify, evaluate, and control the hazards involved in the 3 ammonia refrigeration systems of mechanical room #1.  The 2017 PHA and 2021 PHA Revalidation only addressed a generic process with generic engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards, such as  procedures, mechanical integrity activities, training and safety switches, which did not allow for the employer to determine if the hazards are appropriately controlled and analyze the listed controls for the consequences of failure of those engineering and administrative controls which result from variations in equipment design, safe upper and lower operating and design limits, and operating and maintenance procedures for the types of equipment and controls involved in the mechanical room #1 covered process. Due to the continued operation of a process which has not appropriately identified, evaluated, and controlled the hazards of the process by a PHA, employees have increased risk for exposure to ammonia released from the system(s) leading to corrosive injuries, burns or struck by injuries from fires and explosions, or death.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $13005
  • — Z (S) $13005

1910.119 E03 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Oct 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(e)(3)(iii): The process hazard analysis did not address: Engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases.  a.) As of and prior to November 21, 2024, the employer's process hazard analysis (PHA) did not address the specific controls applicable to system components and the interrelationships with the individual control to the hazards involved in the 3 ammonia refrigeration systems of mechanical room #1.  The 2017 PHA and 2021 PHA Revalidation only addressed generic engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards, such as  procedures, mechanical integrity activities, training and safety switches, which did not allow for the employer to determine if the hazards are appropriately controlled and analyze the listed controls for the consequences of failure of those engineering and administrative controls which result from variations in equipment design, safe upper and lower operating and design limits, and operating and maintenance procedures for the multiple types of equipment and controls involved in the mechanical room #1 covered process. Due to the continued operation of a process which has not appropriately identified, evaluated, and controlled the hazards of the process by a PHA, employees have increased risk for exposure to ammonia released from the system(s) leading to corrosive injuries, burns or struck by injuries from fires and explosions, or death.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Oct 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(e)(3)(iv): The process hazard analysis did not address: Consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls;  a.) As of and prior to November 21, 2024, the employer's process hazard analysis (PHA) did not address the consequences of failure for the specific controls applicable to system components for hazard(s) control involved in the 3 ammonia refrigeration systems of mechanical room #1. The PHA report did not list individual or specific controls for the PHA team to address consequences of failure in the analysis. The 2017 PHA and 2021 PHA Revalidation only addressed generic engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards, such as  procedures, mechanical integrity activities, training and safety switches, which did not allow the employer to analyze the listed controls for the consequences of failure of those engineering and administrative controls which result from variations in equipment design, safe upper and lower operating and design limits, and operating and maintenance procedures for the multiple types of equipment and controls involved in the mechanical room #1 covered process. Due to the continued operation of a process which has not appropriately identified, evaluated, and controlled the hazards of the process by a PHA, employees have increased risk for exposure to ammonia released from the system(s) leading to corrosive injuries, burns or struck by injuries from fires and explosions, or death.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Oct 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(e)(4): The process hazard analysis shall be performed by a team with expertise in engineering and process operations, and the team shall include at least one employee who has experience and knowledge specific to the process being evaluated. Also, one member of the team must be knowledgeable in the specific process hazard analysis methodology being used.  a.) As of and prior to November 21, 2024, the employer's process hazard analysis for the 2021 PHA revalidation was not performed by a team and was only performed by the Senior PSM Area Manager. The PHA revalidation did not include any documentation for team members, other than the Senior PSM Manager, and did not include a team member with operating experience and knowledge specific to the Mechanical Room #1 ammonia refrigeration systems as required by this part, such as a roundsman, refrigeration technician or powerhouse operator (as noted by internal policy for team members).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 F01 II A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Jun 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $10,403 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(A): Operating procedures. The employer shall develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and shall address at least the following elements. Operating limits. Consequences of deviation;   a.) On or about November 21, 2024, the employer had not developed and implemented operating procedures for normal shutdown that contained the consequences of deviation for compressor BC1-32 located in Engine Room #1 in that SOP-011 (COMP-C-32 Engine Room 1) Operation of Ammonia Screw Compressor.  The  procedure did not include failure of the shaft seal as a consequence of deviation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10403

1910.119 F01 II B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Jun 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(B): Operating procedures. The employer shall develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and shall address at least the following elements. Operating limits. Steps required to correct or avoid deviation.  a.) On or about November 21, 2024, the employer had not developed and implemented operating procedures that contained the steps required to correct deviation related to a  leaking mechanical seal for compressor BC1-32 located in Engine Room #1 in that SOP-011 (COMP-C-32 Engine Room 1) Operation of Ammonia Screw Compressor. The 4 step procedure did not include the step or steps to take that address an ammonia leak from the shaft seal during compressor shutdown.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 G01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Jun 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(g)(1)(i): Each employee presently involved in operating a process, and each employee before being involved in operating a newly assigned process, shall be trained in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures as specified in paragraph (f) of this section. The training shall include emphasis on the specific safety and health hazards, emergency operations including shutdown, and safe work practices applicable to the employee's job tasks.  On or about November 21, 2024, the employer failed to train 3rd shift refrigeration technicians on the necessary steps to correct or avoid deviations related to shaft seal leaks during shutdown of screw compressors in Engine Room #1. The 3rd shift refrigeration technicians did not receive training to restart the compressor when the shaft seal fails as part of normal shutdown procedures, resulting in oil containing ammonia vapor to leak from the seal.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 J02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Jun 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $10,403 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.119(j)(2): Written procedures. The employer shall establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment.  a.) On or about November 21, 2024, the employer's written procedure, C-32 AMMONIA COMP USPI INSP., established for performing the weekly oil drip test to monitor the integrity of the mechanical seal for the MYCOM screw compressor, BC1-32, was inadequate. The procedure did not include instructions on how to perform the oil drip test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10403

1910.119 J04 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Abate by
Jun 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(j)(4)(iv): The employer shall document each inspection and test that has been performed on process equipment. The documentation shall identify the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or test, the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was performed, a description of the inspection or test performed, and the results of the inspection or test.  a.) On or about November 21, 2024, the employer did not ensure weekly inspections of the mechanical seal for the MYCOM screw compressor, BC1-32, located in Engine Room #1 were documented. Procedure, C-32 AMMONIA COMP USPI INSP., the results for the number of oil drips observed from the oil drip test and pass/fail criteria results were not documented and/or entered into the employer's computerized maintenance management system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2025
Penalty
Initial $7,802 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, will provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.   a.) On or about November 22, 2024, the employer did not ensure a 55-gallon drum in Engine Room #1 containing US Petrolon Industrial, Inc USPI 1009-68S (Reproductive toxicity) included words, pictures, or symbols, or combination thereof to provide general information about the physical and health hazards of the chemical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $7802

View Advancepierre Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347904096.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.