DENVER, CO —
OSHA Inspection: ELDER CANO RENOVATIONS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELDER CANO RENOVATIONS in 2526 W. 44TH AVE., DENVER, CO 80221 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347915282.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELDER CANO RENOVATIONS
- Site address
- 2526 W. 44TH AVE.
- City
- DENVER
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80221
- Mailing
- 3200 S MABRY WAY, DENVER, CO 80236, DENVER, CO 80236
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 7, 2025
- Abate by
- May 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about December 24, 2024, eye protection was not provided for/to employees using pneumatic nail guns during the installation of asphalt roofing shingles. This condition has the potential to expose employees to struck-by / flying projectile hazards to the eyes.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 7, 2025
- Abate by
- May 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about December 24, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees engaged in roofing activities were donned in /using conventional fall protection (lanyard with harness, ropes/lifelines, anchor points, etc.). Employees in the process of re-roofing a single-story residential property were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet from the top of the structure to ground level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- May 7, 2025
- Abate by
- May 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: (a) On December 4, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees who were working on the steep-pitch roof were utilizing their personal fall arrest systems correctly, in that employees attached their lanyards to the front of their harness at waist level. This condition exposed employees to fall of approximately 10 ft.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.502 D21
- Issued
- May 7, 2025
- Abate by
- May 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: (a) On December 4, 2024, the employer did not ensure that each personal fall arrest system (PFAS) was inspected prior to use, and that defective components were removed from service, in that employees conducting residential re-roofing activities on a high-pitch roof, utilized a personal fall arrest system equipped with frayed lifelines. This condition exposed employees to fall of approximately 10 ft.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 7, 2025
- Abate by
- May 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) On December 4, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls of approximately 10 feet to the ground below while accessing/egressing upper levels of the existing residential property. The ladders were not secured at their top to a rigid support, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladders.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- May 7, 2025
- Abate by
- May 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level: (a) On December 4, 2024, the employer did not ensure that workers required to utilize a portable ladder to transition from ground level to roof a single-story residential property positioned the ladder on a level surface to prevent accidental displacement. This condition exposed to employees to a fall of approximately 10 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347915282.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.