Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: APPLIED ENGINEERING PLASTICS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of APPLIED ENGINEERING PLASTICS, INC. in 6 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, JERSEYVILLE, IL 62052 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 347941213.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Applied Engineering Plastics, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Applied Engineering Plastics, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
JERSEYVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
62052
Mailing
6 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, JERSEYVILLE, IL 62052
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2025
Abate by
Jun 13, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $2,601 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  On and before December 18, 2024, the employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training, and periodic inspections to ensure isolation from energy source and render the machine or equipment inoperative during cleaning operations of a Komo CNC Router, Flex 1005TT, Serial Number 01361-19.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $2601
  • — I (S) $2601
  • — Z (S) $4729

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2025
Abate by
Mar 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,783 · Current $2,081 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:  On and before December 18, 2024, the employer did not provide an educational program to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazard involved with incipient stage fire fighting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2081
  • — Z (S) $3783

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2025
Abate by
Feb 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $1,560 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  During the months of November, and December of 2024, and January 2025, the employer did not provide one or more methods of machine guarding to protect employees operating a Fryer MC-15 Milling Machine from flying chips during the production process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1560
  • — Z (S) $2837

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2025
Abate by
Feb 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,783 · Current $2,081 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   On and before December 18, 2024, the employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii) for employee that use hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to Acetone.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2081
  • — Z (S) $3783

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):   On and before December 18, 2024, the employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for chemicals such as acetone.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2025
Abate by
Feb 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(2):  Employees were not informed of: (i) The requirements of this section; (ii) Any operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present; and, (iii) The location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets required by this section.   On or about December 18, 2024, the employer did not provide training to inform employees of the requirements of this section, and the location and availability of a written hazard communications program, and safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347941213.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.