Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NASSOUR CREATIONS LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of NASSOUR CREATIONS LLC in 33 COURT STREET, BINGHAMTON, NY 13901 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 347971228.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nassour Creations LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nassour Creations LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
33 COURT STREET
City
BINGHAMTON
State
NY
ZIP
13901
Mailing
1432 SOUTH 23RD STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19146
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2025
Abate by
Sep 3, 2025
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $398
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers demonstrated a lack of proficiency in working from scaffolding, specifically when observed climbing cross braces, working without  fall protection, and when connecting personal fall arrest equipment in a manner that is outside the design of that equipment and in selection of anchorages that would not provide the required tensile strength.  a Serious citation was issued for this item that citation required abatement documentation which the employer did not provide.     Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.454 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2025
Abate by
Jul 21, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.454(c)(3): The employer failed to retrain employees that showed indications through work performance of not retaining the requisite proficiency:  a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers demonstrated a lack of proficiency in working from scaffolding, specifically when observed climbing cross braces, working without  fall protection, and when connecting personal fall arrest equipment in a manner that is outside the design of that equipment and in selection of anchorages that would not provide the required tensile strength.   Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2482.5
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.451 E09 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(9)(iv): Cross braces on tubular welded frame scaffolds were used as a means of access or egress.   a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers used cross-braces to climb onto and off of the bottom level of scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 13 feet to ground and 6 feet 4 inches to the next lower level.  The configuration of the lower level was that fall would result in a 13 foot fall.  Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system.  b) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 19 feet 4 inches to ground and 12 feet 8 inches to the next lower level.  Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system.  c) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 25 feet 8 inches to ground and 19 feet 2 inches to the next lower level.  Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system.  d) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 32 feet 4 inches to ground and 25 feet 6 inches to the next lower level.  Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system.  e) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 38 feet 8 inches to ground and 31 feet 6 inches to the next lower level.   Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:  a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY, at the rear of the building.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers accessed a roof level from a portable extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing.     a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY, at the rear of the building and on the second roof elevation.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers accessed a roof level from a portable extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.5
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use:   a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY, at the rear of the building.  On or about 1/10/25:  Workers accessed a roof level from a portable extension ladder that had a damaged rung.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347971228.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.