BINGHAMTON, NY —
OSHA Inspection: NASSOUR CREATIONS LLC
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of NASSOUR CREATIONS LLC in 33 COURT STREET, BINGHAMTON, NY 13901 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 347971228.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NASSOUR CREATIONS LLC
- Site address
- 33 COURT STREET
- City
- BINGHAMTON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13901
- Mailing
- 1432 SOUTH 23RD STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19146
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238190
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold. On or about 1/10/25: Workers demonstrated a lack of proficiency in working from scaffolding, specifically when observed climbing cross braces, working without fall protection, and when connecting personal fall arrest equipment in a manner that is outside the design of that equipment and in selection of anchorages that would not provide the required tensile strength. a Serious citation was issued for this item that citation required abatement documentation which the employer did not provide. Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1926.454 C03
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(c)(3): The employer failed to retrain employees that showed indications through work performance of not retaining the requisite proficiency: a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold. On or about 1/10/25: Workers demonstrated a lack of proficiency in working from scaffolding, specifically when observed climbing cross braces, working without fall protection, and when connecting personal fall arrest equipment in a manner that is outside the design of that equipment and in selection of anchorages that would not provide the required tensile strength. Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 E09 IV
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(9)(iv): Cross braces on tubular welded frame scaffolds were used as a means of access or egress. a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold. On or about 1/10/25: Workers used cross-braces to climb onto and off of the bottom level of scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold. On or about 1/10/25: Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 13 feet to ground and 6 feet 4 inches to the next lower level. The configuration of the lower level was that fall would result in a 13 foot fall. Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system. b) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold. On or about 1/10/25: Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 19 feet 4 inches to ground and 12 feet 8 inches to the next lower level. Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system. c) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold. On or about 1/10/25: Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 25 feet 8 inches to ground and 19 feet 2 inches to the next lower level. Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system. d) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold. On or about 1/10/25: Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 32 feet 4 inches to ground and 25 feet 6 inches to the next lower level. Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system. e) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY on the scaffold. On or about 1/10/25: Workers performed tasks from a scaffold pick 38 feet 8 inches to ground and 31 feet 6 inches to the next lower level. Workers were not protected from falling by either a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY, at the rear of the building. On or about 1/10/25: Workers accessed a roof level from a portable extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing. a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY, at the rear of the building and on the second roof elevation. On or about 1/10/25: Workers accessed a roof level from a portable extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1773.5
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.1053 B15
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use: a) 34 Court Street, Binghamton, NY, at the rear of the building. On or about 1/10/25: Workers accessed a roof level from a portable extension ladder that had a damaged rung.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238190)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347971228.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.