Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADRIANO ONORATO DA SILVA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ADRIANO ONORATO DA SILVA in 115 LOCK STREET, NASHUA, NH 03064 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347978587.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Adriano Onorato DA Silva — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Adriano Onorato DA Silva is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
115 LOCK STREET
City
NASHUA
State
NH
ZIP
03064
Mailing
165 NEW BOSTON STREET, WOBURN, MA 01801
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2025
Abate by
Jul 21, 2025
Penalty
Initial $531 · Current $531
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 2a, 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b, 4c  nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent June 2, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $531

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $4,729
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)   Site- Employees working at the site were exposed to fall, struck by, trip, puncture, fire, and powered industrial truck hazards where the employer did provide for frequent and regular inspections of the worksite conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas:   Site- Employees were not protected from trip and puncture hazards where lumber with protruding nails was picked up off of the ground and building floors.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Site- Employees were not protected from overhead struck by hazards where head protection was not worn.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agent:  Site- Employees operating circular saws were not protected for eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.602(c)(1)(i): Lifting and hauling equipment did not have the rated capacity clearly posted on the vehicle so as to be clearly visible to the operator:  Site- Employees were not protected from struck by and crushing hazards where the Lull Highlander 844C-42 all-terrain forklift that was operated at the site did not have load charts or a rated capacity posted on the vehicle.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $4,729
29 CFR  1926.453(b)(2)(v):A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:  Site- Employees operating and working from a JLG 460SJ aerial lift were not protected from an ejection hazard where the employees were not connected to the boom or basket with a lanyard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.453 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) working in an aerial lift were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket:  Site- Employees working from a JLG 460SJ aerial lift were not protected from an ejection hazard where the employees were standing on the railings of the aerial lift basket to increase their working height.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Apr 4, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $4,729
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   Site- Employees operating and working from a JLG 460SJ aerial lift were not provided with aerial lift training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Apr 4, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Site- Employees exposed to fall hazards were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):  Site- Employees were not protected from struck by and crushing hazards where the employee operating the Lull Highlander 844C-42 all-terrain forklift that was was not provided with operator training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $4,729
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Site- Employees working from the second and third floor were not protected from falls of approximately 8 feet where guardrails were not installed around each stair opening in the floor.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 1 8 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:  Site- Employees were not protected from trip hazards where the  stairways inside each unit, from the first floor to the third floor, did not have handrails.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2025
Abate by
Feb 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:   Site- Employees were not protected from fall hazards of up to approximately 8 feet where stair rail systems were not installed along the unprotected sides of the stairways.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347978587.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.