Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MCDONOUGH MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MCDONOUGH MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 2320 MELBY STREET, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 (NAICS 333318). OSHA activity number 347994287.

Watch Mcdonough Manufacturing Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mcdonough Manufacturing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2320 MELBY STREET
City
EAU CLAIRE
State
WI
ZIP
54703
Mailing
2320 MELBY STREET, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333318
Employees
44
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8441.00 · Current $5909.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:   (a) Shop floor; On or about January 22, 2025, and dates prior, the employer did not verify and certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed, including the personal protective equipment (PPE) required to be worn by employees exposed to phenolic material during cutting operations.   (b) Shop floor; On or about January 22, 2025, and dates prior, the employer did not verify and certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed, including the personal protective equipment (PPE) required to be worn by employees exposed to paint vapors during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5908.7
  • — Z (S) $8441

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   (a) Shop floor; On or about the week of December 30, 2024, and dates prior, a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required use of respirators during phenolic material cutting operations.   (b) Shop floor; On or about January 22, 2025, and dates prior, a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required use of respirators during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:   (a) Shop floor; On or about January 22, 2025, and dates prior, the employer did not implement a change schedule for organic vapor cartridges used with half facepiece elastomeric respirator(s) during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   (a) Shop floor; On or about the week of December 30, 2024, and dates prior, medical evaluations were not provided to employees prior to required use of respirators during phenolic material cutting operations.   (b) Shop floor; On or about January 22, 2025, and dates prior, medical evaluations were not provided to employees prior to required use of respirators during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:  (a) Shop floor; On or about the week of December 30, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested prior to initial use and/or on an annual basis for required use of tight-fitting respirators during phenolic material cutting operations.   (b) Shop floor; On or about January 22, 2025, and dates prior, the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested prior to initial use and/or on an annual basis for required use of tight-fitting respirators during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  (a) Shop floor; On or about the week of December 30, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) were clean-shaven where the respirator sealing surface contacts the face prior to required use of tight-fitting respirators during phenolic material cutting operations.   (b) Shop floor; On or about January 22, 2025, and dates prior, the employer did not ensure that employees were clean-shaven where the respirator sealing surface contacts the face prior to required use of tight-fitting respirators during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):   (a) Shop floor; On or about the week of December 30, 2024, and dates prior, the employer did not provide adequate training for employees required to use respirators during phenolic material cutting operations.   (b) Shop floor; On or about January 22, 2025, and dates prior, the employer did not provide adequate training for employees required to use respirators during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347994287.