Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NGG HOME IMPROVEMENT INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of NGG HOME IMPROVEMENT INC. in 1 RUTH CT, MONSEY, NY 10952 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347996134.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch NGG Home Improvement INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NGG Home Improvement INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 RUTH CT
City
MONSEY
State
NY
ZIP
10952
Mailing
4 LAFAYETTE ST, APT #2, SPRING VALLEY, NY 10977
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6):  Scaffolds were not designed and constructed by a qualified person:    Location: 1 Ruth Court, Monsey, NY    a) On or about January 12, 2025, an employee was working on a soffit approximately 16' 9" high from a makeshift scaffold that was constructed by placing a 24' long, 12" wide aluminum stage between two ladders. The scaffold was not designed and constructed by a qualified person exposing an employee to fall hazards of approximately 11'7".  NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the casefile, the employer need not submit certification nor documentation of abatement of this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $6620
  • — Z (S) $6620

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:  Location: 1 Ruth Court, Monsey, NY    a) On or about January 12, 2025, an employee was working on a soffit approximately 16' 9" high from a makeshift scaffold that was constructed by placing a 24' long, 12" wide aluminum stage between two ladders. The scaffold platform was not at least 18" wide exposing an employee to fall hazards of approximately 11'7".  NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the casefile, the employer need not submit certification nor documentation of abatement of this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $6620
  • — Z (S) $6620

1926.451 F07

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration. Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Location: 1 Ruth Ct, Monsey, NY  a) On or about January 09, 2025, the employer did not ensure that two pump jack scaffolds used in the back and south side of the house, as well as a makeshift scaffold used in the front of the house were erected under the supervision and direction of a competent person exposing employees to fall hazards between approximately 11'7" and 17'10".   b) On or about January 09, 2025, the employer did not ensure that two pump jack scaffolds used in the back and south side of the house, as well as a makeshift scaffold used in the front of the house were erected only by experienced and trained employees exposing employees to fall hazards between approximately 11'7" and 17'10".  NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the casefile, the employer need not submit certification nor documentation of abatement of this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $6620
  • — Z (S) $6620

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Location: 1 Ruth Court, Monsey, NY  a) On or about January 12, 2025, an employee was exposed to a fall up to approximately  11'7" to a concrete slab below while working from a scaffold constructed by horizontally placing a stage on the 12th rung of two (2) metal ladders. The employee was not protected by guardrails or a personal fall arrest system.  NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the casefile, the employer need not submit certification nor documentation of abatement of this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $6620
  • — Z (S) $6620

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.  Location: 1 Ruth Court, Monsey, NY  a) On or about January 09, 2025,  employees utilizing a pump jack scaffold in the rear of the house to remove and replace siding on a two-story residential building did not secure the poles to the building by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom.  b) On or about January 09, 2025,  employees utilizing a pump jack scaffold on the south side of the house to remove and replace siding on a two-story residential building did not secure the poles to the building by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom.  NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the casefile, the employer need not submit certification nor documentation of abatement of this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $6620
  • — Z (S) $6620

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2025
Abate by
Jul 17, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   Location: 1 Ruth Court, Monsey, NY  a) On or about January 12, 2025, an employee performing soffit work from a makeshift scaffold was not trained by a qualified person on how to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. The employee was exposed to fall hazards approximately 11'7" to the concrete slab below.  NOTE: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item, failure to comply will result in an additional penalty of $1,000.00 as per 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $4729
  • — Z (S) $4729

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR  1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye.  Location: 1 Ruth Court, Monsey, NY  a) On or about January 12, 2025, the employer failed to notify OSHA within 24 hours of a work-related incident when an employee was hospitalized after falling from a makeshift scaffold.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $3300
  • — C (O) $4729
  • — Z (O) $4729

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2025
Abate by
Jul 11, 2025
Penalty
Initial $946 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR  1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.  Location: 4 Lafayette St, Apt #2, Spring Valley, NY 10977  a) On or about June 25, 2025, the employer did not provide OSHA 300, 300A and 301 logs within four business hours when requested by Compliance Safety and Health Officer.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $700
  • — C (O) $946
  • — Z (O) $946

View NGG Home Improvement INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347996134.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.