LOWELL, MA —
OSHA Inspection: CORRENTINO CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CORRENTINO CONSTRUCTION INC. in 251 CLARK ROAD, LOWELL, MA 01852 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348000753.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CORRENTINO CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 251 CLARK ROAD
- City
- LOWELL
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01852
- Mailing
- 90 WALNUT STREET APT 1, PEABODY, MA 01960
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying objects while using a nail gun. Location: Jobsite; On or about 01/27/2025, employees were allowed to utilize pneumatic nail guns without proper eye/face protection to protect against potential flying objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 B07
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(7): On scaffolds where platforms were overlapped to create a long platform, the overlap did not occur only over supports, and the platforms were not nailed together or otherwise restrained to prevent movement. Location: Jobsite; On or about 01/27/2025, employees were exposed to a fall of 10 to 12-feet or more while working from a pump jack scaffold that did not have the work platforms bridged over a support and were not otherwise restrained to prevent movement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): An employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Location: Jobsite; On or about 01/27/2025, employees were exposed to a fall of greater than 10 feet above a lower level in the following instances: a) 10 to 12-feet above the ground while working from a pump jack scaffold that was erected without a complete guardrail system or fall protection system to protect them. b) 22-feet above the ground while working from an improvised platform on the forks of a rough terrain forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles of pump jack scaffolding were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Location: Jobsite; On or about 01/27/2025, employees were working from a pumpjack scaffolding at a height of 10 to 12-feet above the ground where the poles/legs of the pumpjack scaffolding were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing at both the top and bottom.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.602 C01 VIII A
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(A): The industrial truck was not equipped with a safety platform/cage firmly secured to the lifting carriage and/or forks when used for lifting personnel. Location: Job site; On or about 01/27/2025, the employer allowed an employee to be hoisted on an improvised work platform, that was just a wooden pallet, 22-feet above the ground to the second story of a new residential construction to perform siding activities. The improvised platform was not a manufacturer approved work platform and was unsecured/unguarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed. Location: Jobsite; On or about 01/27/2025, employees were allowed to utilize Werner portable extension ladders as a makeshift guardrail for the Alum-A-Pole pump jack scaffolding system, which is not a purpose for which the ladders were designed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348000753.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.