Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO CRUZ TELLEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDUARDO CRUZ TELLEZ in 1149 128TH ST., LEMONT, IL 60439 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348013871.

Watch Eduardo Cruz Tellez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eduardo Cruz Tellez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDUARDO CRUZ TELLEZ
Site address
1149 128TH ST.
City
LEMONT
State
IL
ZIP
60439
Mailing
2746 S KOLIN AVE., 2ND FLOOR, CHICAGO, IL 60623
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.   a. On or about August 11, 2025, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected:  Citation Number                                                Item Number                                    Abatement Date 0200107/11/2025
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) On or about January 28, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations as high as twenty (20') feet five (5") inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person:  a) On or about January 28, 2025, the employer did not ensure anchors used as part of personal fall arrest equipment were installed properly while residential roofing operations were being conducted exposing the employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  a) On or about January 28, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the attachment point of the body harness being used by an employee as part of a fall protection system was in the center of the employee's back exposing the employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  a) On or about January 28, 2025, the employer did not ensure that fall protection training was maintained and/or had been sufficiently documented as required by the standard for employees exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348013871.